Message [Page 6 of 9]
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:05 pm
Neely4Life wrote:Fact of the matter is people in Ottawa are obsessed with the names on the back of jersey's instead of the logo on the front. Ottawa fans have a "please look at us' complex. Thats why people want Spezza to stay, and thats why people want to go get the next big thing in goal.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:08 pm Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:10 pmNeely4Life wrote:Meh, I like Fisher, not a big fan of Comrie so...
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:11 pm Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:22 pm
504Heater wrote:RobbyJ wrote:There is no market for Goalies right now. Vermette for Leclaire could be done in the summer if BM wants to. If Columbus really wants Vermette for the playoff run it is going to cost more than an expensive, injured backup. Everyone please stop with the Kris Russell, BM picked up Campoli so I would imagine he is no longer interested in Russell.
He's only just begun to revamp this crappy D, Russell is really, really good. I betcha he's going for him as well.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:23 pm
Urkie wrote:504Heater wrote:RobbyJ wrote:There is no market for Goalies right now. Vermette for Leclaire could be done in the summer if BM wants to. If Columbus really wants Vermette for the playoff run it is going to cost more than an expensive, injured backup. Everyone please stop with the Kris Russell, BM picked up Campoli so I would imagine he is no longer interested in Russell.
He's only just begun to revamp this crappy D, Russell is really, really good. I betcha he's going for him as well.
Russell would be good Heater but the Jackets aren't giving him up. He's already their best defensemen so it really wouldn't make any sense.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:26 pmNeely4Life wrote:Jesus, I dont get people... people in Ottawa are willing to wait 7 year for Spezza to come around in Ottawa, but they are not willing to wait less than 6 months for a top goaltending prospect to try and be the number 1 guy.
Ottawa always tried to short term fix with goaltending and what happens? Gerber, Hasek... Do it right, develope your number 1 guy during a REBUILD year, which next year defently is, the playoffs are still a long shot.
For once it looks like Ottawa is going to handle their goaltending situation correctly.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:29 pm
Urkie wrote:
Russell would be good Heater but the Jackets aren't giving him up. He's already their best defensemen so it really wouldn't make any sense.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:32 pm504Heater wrote:Urkie wrote:
Russell would be good Heater but the Jackets aren't giving him up. He's already their best defensemen so it really wouldn't make any sense.
Right now I think they need Vermette more than they need Russell though.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:33 pmUrkie wrote:True but at the same time I don't think they would be willing to part with Russell even if it is for Vermette. I think he's pretty much untouchable.
If we're dealing with the Jackets then there are 2 guys that really stand out.....Leclaire and Klesla. Those are the guys they are looking to trade.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:36 pm Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:38 pm
504Heater wrote:Urkie wrote:True but at the same time I don't think they would be willing to part with Russell even if it is for Vermette. I think he's pretty much untouchable.
If we're dealing with the Jackets then there are 2 guys that really stand out.....Leclaire and Klesla. Those are the guys they are looking to trade.
You don't think they'd part with Russell for Vermette? It almost happened back in January when Vermette wasn't anywhere near where he is (although granted, Russell wasn't either).
What makes you think they won't move Russell?
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:41 pm504Heater wrote:You don't think they'd part with Russell for Vermette? It almost happened back in January when Vermette wasn't anywhere near where he is (although granted, Russell wasn't either).
What makes you think they won't move Russell?
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:51 pmasq2 wrote:
Howson has said he won't?
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:52 pmUrkie wrote:
Because Russell is too important to their team now. Back in January he wasn't as important.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:53 pmNeely4Life wrote:We just got Campolli, why do people want to see Russell here? So we can have the smallest blueline in the league and the softest group of forwards going?
Guys, Vermette wont be in Columbus unless its a 1st coming back.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 3:08 pm504Heater wrote:Neely4Life wrote:We just got Campolli, why do people want to see Russell here? So we can have the smallest blueline in the league and the softest group of forwards going?
Guys, Vermette wont be in Columbus unless its a 1st coming back.
You can never have enough puck movers, especially blazing fast ones with skill?
That would be my short answer. But y'all know I'd rather keep Vermette.
Re: Vermette for Leclaire? Mon Mar 02, 2009 3:12 pm
Message [Page 6 of 9]
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
|
Home
Publications