rooneypoo wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:rooneypoo wrote:
Oh settle down, it needed to be done and was the right call. You don't sit Foligno because he hits and fore checks hard, and his been one of our better forwards lately. You don't sit Shannon because the guy works his Donkey of every shift. Ditto Winchester, who (with Foligno and Neil) was part of the best OTT line the night before. I could have understood benching Ruutu, but CC was clearly planning on putting OTT's best and most consistent line (Kelly, Ruutu, Neil) back together (the started the game together) -- and look how that worked out.
Regin has had a ton of games playing in the top 3. He hasn't produced a lot (1 goal in that span), and he's not the sort of guy who goes out and hits and fore checks hard -- so if he's not producing, it makes sense that he sits.
You're making much ado about not very much here.
Oh Roon. I know all that, it's damn lucky for Clouston it all worked out though, benching a young player for not working hard enough is one thing, benching a young player because he's not scoring despite the effort is quite another.
If you knew all that, then you shouldn't have posted that other inane comment.
Why was he benched then? Because he's not scoring or because he wasn't competing hard enough? If it was lack of scoring then Foligno should have been benched, because CLEARLY Regin is the better two-way player.