LeCaptain wrote:Just looked at the stats. 5th best offense in the league, 3rd worst defense.
Please tell me Murray is working the phones.
My sources say he's going "All in."
LeCaptain wrote:Just looked at the stats. 5th best offense in the league, 3rd worst defense.
Please tell me Murray is working the phones.
wprager wrote:So Anderson has two great games in a row (Montreal and Winnipeg) and, without a back-to-back game in sight, Cameron goes with Hammond. I don't think anyone understood that move at the time. Shades of MacLean with Lehner? Doubt it had much to do with Anderson's performance tonight, but it's still a strange move to make.
Two wins, then two losses. Two chances to run a 3 game winning streak with a loss each time. This team is eerily similar to MacLean's team last year.
LeCaptain wrote:Just looked at the stats. 5th best offense in the league, 3rd worst defense.
Please tell me Murray is working the phones.
Ev wrote:wprager wrote:Ev wrote:LeCaptain wrote:Yeah no need for a 1st round pick right now with Chabot and White, Paul etc. I'd trade it any day because I believe in our prospects.
Cowen was good until he was paired with Boro.
Wiercioch and Boro are not NHL D-men.
I think Boro is and he's just a sophomore, but he's obviously just an average to below average one and he's getting paid like it
Boro is what he is. Cameron is trying to use him as if he was something else.
Play him on the third pairing, on his left side, against teams that are bigger and slower. Sit him against smaller, faster teams. *DO NOT* make him play his wrong side. *DO NOT* pay him with another non-puck-moving defenseman.
It's not all on Weircioch, either. He wasn't great last night, true, but is he really playing any differently than he did last year or is it Ceci who has regressed a bit? Perhaps a little from both. Maybe they need to play a little less? Maybe it's time to split up Karlsson and Methot and play 65-46 and 5-3 as the 1A/1B pairings, then 43-75 or 45-2 at the bottom.
Short-term, though, Weircioch needs to come out after last night. Move Cowen up to play with Ceci and Wideman-Borowiecki in the bottom pairing.
Cowen played with Ceci yesterday, Boro played with Wiercioch.
tim1_2 wrote:wprager wrote:So Anderson has two great games in a row (Montreal and Winnipeg) and, without a back-to-back game in sight, Cameron goes with Hammond. I don't think anyone understood that move at the time. Shades of MacLean with Lehner? Doubt it had much to do with Anderson's performance tonight, but it's still a strange move to make.
Two wins, then two losses. Two chances to run a 3 game winning streak with a loss each time. This team is eerily similar to MacLean's team last year.
Why are you even talking about goaltending when it hasn't been a problem? Hammond stole a point for us in Carolina and Anderson's been very good with the exception of last night. Your fixation on the goalies sometimes is so far off it's just silly. The problem is our team defence, and that's that.
SpezDispensed wrote:LeCaptain wrote:Just looked at the stats. 5th best offense in the league, 3rd worst defense.
Please tell me Murray is working the phones.
Yeah, it's time to get going. We're a strong offensive team with 2 legitimate D-men and 1 up and comer in Ceci. We have a good number 6, but this team is missing a number 3 man in a huge way.
Problem is...they're hard to get.
Ev wrote:asq2 wrote:Yeah Russell was a great pick-up for my fantasy team. At the same time you kind of wonder how long a player that size could keep up sacrificing his body like that.
Who would you offer for Russell? I wouldn't touch our top-line, and I'm reticent to move Zibanejad or Lazar (less so Lazar). I doubt Wiercioch + Puempel/Prince + a pick gets it done though -- isn't he an alternate captain for Calgary? I think they're more likely to try to move Wideman. I guess you could package Lazar and hope that Colin White can step in soon (and Nick Paul I suppose).
I'd rather trade zibanejad over lazar. But I wouldn't want to trade either at this point. I think you just package your 1st round pick and Wiercioch to grab a d.
There's no need to part ways with a 1st.LeCaptain wrote:SpezDispensed wrote:LeCaptain wrote:Just looked at the stats. 5th best offense in the league, 3rd worst defense.
Please tell me Murray is working the phones.
Yeah, it's time to get going. We're a strong offensive team with 2 legitimate D-men and 1 up and comer in Ceci. We have a good number 6, but this team is missing a number 3 man in a huge way.
Problem is...they're hard to get.
Calgary has 4 guys who play over 23 mins a game, and that doesn't include Dougie Hamilton who can probably play top 4. They would probably take our 1st round pick.
Flo The Action wrote:There's no need to part ways with a 1st.LeCaptain wrote:SpezDispensed wrote:LeCaptain wrote:Just looked at the stats. 5th best offense in the league, 3rd worst defense.
Please tell me Murray is working the phones.
Yeah, it's time to get going. We're a strong offensive team with 2 legitimate D-men and 1 up and comer in Ceci. We have a good number 6, but this team is missing a number 3 man in a huge way.
Problem is...they're hard to get.
Calgary has 4 guys who play over 23 mins a game, and that doesn't include Dougie Hamilton who can probably play top 4. They would probably take our 1st round pick.
SpezDispensed wrote:Who would we be parting with a first for?
Come on. Neither of those guys could be a top 4 and that's our need.wprager wrote:SpezDispensed wrote:Who would we be parting with a first for?
What about the former NHL D-men we have in Bingo -- Kostka (RHS) and Fraser (LHS).
Biggest thing that stands in the way of a trade is the current roster. We have 7 D (plus Chris "I'm not dead yet; I'm feeling better; I think I'll go for a walk" Phillips) with a few more pushing for a spot. It's one thing to say we can upgrade Cowen or Weircioch, but who would take either one? With Cowen, his contract would make him hard to move to a team that's looking to shed cap space. Weircioch is not really that far behind. Any many-for-one deal we've been contemplating is not going to include either of them. So that leaves Borowiecki and Wideman.
Wideman+Borowiecki plus forward prospect (Prince or Puempel) for Scandella. Bring up Kostka as the RHS on the third pairing. Throw in a pick if that's not enough.
Karlsson-Methot
Ceci-Scandella
Kostka-Cowen/Weircioch
Cap-wise this clears $2.6M for Minny and reduces the roster log jams by 1 up front and on the back-end for the Sens.
tim1_2 wrote:It certainly wouldn't hurt to try both Kostka and Fraser at this point. I don't think either one is a long-term solution, but what is there to lose? Our defence can't really get much worse.
wprager wrote:SpezDispensed wrote:Who would we be parting with a first for?
What about the former NHL D-men we have in Bingo -- Kostka (RHS) and Fraser (LHS).
Biggest thing that stands in the way of a trade is the current roster. We have 7 D (plus Chris "I'm not dead yet; I'm feeling better; I think I'll go for a walk" Phillips) with a few more pushing for a spot. It's one thing to say we can upgrade Cowen or Weircioch, but who would take either one? With Cowen, his contract would make him hard to move to a team that's looking to shed cap space. Weircioch is not really that far behind. Any many-for-one deal we've been contemplating is not going to include either of them. So that leaves Borowiecki and Wideman.
Wideman+Borowiecki plus forward prospect (Prince or Puempel) for Scandella. Bring up Kostka as the RHS on the third pairing. Throw in a pick if that's not enough.
Karlsson-Methot
Ceci-Scandella
Kostka-Cowen/Weircioch
Cap-wise this clears $2.6M for Minny and reduces the roster log jams by 1 up front and on the back-end for the Sens.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|