Free Agency - Where Do They Go?

wprager wrote:

spader wrote:

SpezDispenser wrote:Zach Parise - Minnesota
Ryan Suter - Detroit
Filip Kuba - Dallas
Jiri Hudler - Florida
Matt Carle - Ottawa
Martin Brodeur - NJ
P.A. Parenteau - Ottawa
Jason Garrison - Vancouver
Alex Semin - Detroit
Jaromir Jagr - Philly
Shane Doan - Anaheim
Dustin Penner - LA

Getting PAP and a vet defenseman would be a great offseason.

If Parenteau is hit head-first into the glass from behind and it leaves a mark -- would that be a PAP smear?

More important than "Where do they go" is "Who's going to keep me up to date while I'm on a patio downtown?"

I fully understand that it's Eklund, and therefore garbage, but this is an interesting take:

On Jagr...

I keep hearing the Oilers, and it makes a TON of sense. What Jagr did for a young Giroux this past season was more valuable than his on-ice performance. Jagr teaches good players how to be great players.

http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Eklund/Rumors-Heating-UpBernier-to-Toronto-Nash-to-Det-Yandle-to-NYR-MORE/1/45307

It's not a bad conclusion. I also think Suter would be the perfect fit for the Oilers but there's no chance he goes there.

Zach Parise - MIN
Ryan Suter - MIN
Filip Kuba - DAL
Jiri Hudler - NAS
Matt Carle - NYR
Martin Brodeur - MTL
P.A. Parenteau - OTT or NYR
Jason Garrison - WIN or NYR
Alex Semin - BUF
Jaromir Jagr -NYR or EDM
Shane Doan - SJ
Dustin Penner - TOR
Ray Whitney - CAR

Zach Parise - New Jersey
Ryan Suter - Detroit
Filip Kuba - New York Rangers
Jiri Hudler - New York Rangers
Matt Carle - New York Rangers
Martin Brodeur - New Jersey
P.A. Parenteau - New York Rangers
Jason Garrison - New York Rangers
Alex Semin - New York Rangers
Jaromir Jagr - Calgary
Shane Doan - New York Rangers
Dustin Penner - New York Rangers

There's just no damn ways Slats sits on his hands with cap room.

spader wrote:More important than "Where do they go" is "Who's going to keep me up to date while I'm on a patio downtown?"

Is that patio located in 1973?

You'd practically have to go out of your way in today's day and age to not keep up to date.

hemlock wrote:

spader wrote:More important than "Where do they go" is "Who's going to keep me up to date while I'm on a patio downtown?"

Is that patio located in 1973?

You'd practically have to go out of your way in today's day and age to not keep up to date.

Not just that, but back in '73 you could sit outside on a patio and not worry about getting burned alive by the sun.

Investment advice (may be too soon for us, but perhaps for your kids): Buy beachfront property in Hudson's Bay in the next 10 years; in 20 years it will be the new Caribbean.

wprager wrote:

hemlock wrote:

spader wrote:More important than "Where do they go" is "Who's going to keep me up to date while I'm on a patio downtown?"

Is that patio located in 1973?

You'd practically have to go out of your way in today's day and age to not keep up to date.

Not just that, but back in '73 you could sit outside on a patio and not worry about getting burned alive by the sun.

Investment advice (may be too soon for us, but perhaps for your kids): Buy beachfront property in Hudson's Bay in the next 10 years; in 20 years it will be the new Caribbean.

Sure, if you believe in global warming.

hemlock wrote:

spader wrote:More important than "Where do they go" is "Who's going to keep me up to date while I'm on a patio downtown?"

Is that patio located in 1973?

You'd practically have to go out of your way in today's day and age to not keep up to date.

I don't have a data plan and don't want to resort to overhearing info.

subscribe to tsn text alerts?

hemlock wrote:

wprager wrote:

hemlock wrote:

spader wrote:More important than "Where do they go" is "Who's going to keep me up to date while I'm on a patio downtown?"

Is that patio located in 1973?

You'd practically have to go out of your way in today's day and age to not keep up to date.

Not just that, but back in '73 you could sit outside on a patio and not worry about getting burned alive by the sun.

Investment advice (may be too soon for us, but perhaps for your kids): Buy beachfront property in Hudson's Bay in the next 10 years; in 20 years it will be the new Caribbean.

Sure, if you believe in global warming ozone depletion.

fyp. It's different.

Riprock wrote:subscribe to tsn text alerts?

See that, Hemlock? That's called practical advice. Thanks, Ripper.

np. http://www.tsn.ca/contact/#sms

spader wrote:

Riprock wrote:subscribe to tsn text alerts?

See that, Hemlock? That's called practical advice. Thanks, Ripper.

Where's the shrug emoticon?

spader wrote:

hemlock wrote:

wprager wrote:

hemlock wrote:

spader wrote:More important than "Where do they go" is "Who's going to keep me up to date while I'm on a patio downtown?"

Is that patio located in 1973?

You'd practically have to go out of your way in today's day and age to not keep up to date.

Not just that, but back in '73 you could sit outside on a patio and not worry about getting burned alive by the sun.

Investment advice (may be too soon for us, but perhaps for your kids): Buy beachfront property in Hudson's Bay in the next 10 years; in 20 years it will be the new Caribbean.

Sure, if you believe in global warming ozone depletion.

fyp. It's different.

It's all poppycock, either way.

hemlock wrote:

spader wrote:

hemlock wrote:

wprager wrote:

hemlock wrote:

spader wrote:More important than "Where do they go" is "Who's going to keep me up to date while I'm on a patio downtown?"

Is that patio located in 1973?

You'd practically have to go out of your way in today's day and age to not keep up to date.

Not just that, but back in '73 you could sit outside on a patio and not worry about getting burned alive by the sun.

Investment advice (may be too soon for us, but perhaps for your kids): Buy beachfront property in Hudson's Bay in the next 10 years; in 20 years it will be the new Caribbean.

Sure, if you believe in global warming ozone depletion.

fyp. It's different.

It's all poppycock, either way.

Ha. The science of global warming has been questioned extensively. I've never heard anyone (up to this point) that disagrees with the science behind ozone depletion (a measurable phenomenon).

spader wrote:

hemlock wrote:

wprager wrote:

hemlock wrote:

spader wrote:More important than "Where do they go" is "Who's going to keep me up to date while I'm on a patio downtown?"

Is that patio located in 1973?

You'd practically have to go out of your way in today's day and age to not keep up to date.

Not just that, but back in '73 you could sit outside on a patio and not worry about getting burned alive by the sun.

Investment advice (may be too soon for us, but perhaps for your kids): Buy beachfront property in Hudson's Bay in the next 10 years; in 20 years it will be the new Caribbean.

Sure, if you believe in global warming ozone depletion.

fyp. It's different.

Yep. Back in the '70s I spent quite a few summers working at a camp in the Laurentians. Back in those days people would apply tanning lotion to *tan more*. One summer I was lifeguard, and one week I had 8 hours on duty every day. No hat, no sunblock, no problem. Things have definitely changed and, you're right, w.r.t. getting burned it is all about the ozone layer and not global warming -- however the two go hand in hand as the ozone layer depletion is a contributing factor to global warming.