GM Hockey
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
GM Hockey

You are not connected. Please login or register

Ottawa Senators (present and past) TIDBITS & QUICK HITS!

+14
dennycrane
tim1_2
wprager
DefenceWinsChampionships
spader
TheAvatar
LeCaptain
Cap'n Clutch
PTFlea
Flo The Action
Oglethorpe
Ev
SeawaySensFan
NEELY
18 posters

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 6 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 38 ... 67  Next

Go down  Message [Page 9 of 67]

Ev


Franchise Player
Franchise Player

We won't have to overpay if he wants to come back

PTFlea


Co-Founder
Co-Founder

SeawaySensFan wrote:
SpezDispensed wrote:Vermette makes a lot of sense.  

I've always been a big fan of Vermette but I'm a bigger fan of the Senators so I'm call it like I see it. Vermette is certainly a slight upgrade on Legwand, a touch younger too, but why would you bring him in when you had basically the same player and chose not to play him?

Well, for one thing Vermette is on pace for ~55 points and is a fast skater.

Legwand is on pace for ~35 and is the slowest guy in the NHL - or if he's not, he's close.

Vermette is 16th in the entire NHL in faceoff % - 55.8% to be exact.

While Legwand is in the top...300 or so with a 48% faceoff %.

So speed, puck possession and more production = major upgrade IMO.  Plus a fan favourite for what that's worth (not much I guess).

SeawaySensFan


Franchise Player
Franchise Player

SpezDispensed wrote:
SeawaySensFan wrote:
SpezDispensed wrote:Vermette makes a lot of sense.  

I've always been a big fan of Vermette but I'm a bigger fan of the Senators so I'm call it like I see it. Vermette is certainly a slight upgrade on Legwand, a touch younger too, but why would you bring him in when you had basically the same player and chose not to play him?

Well, for one thing Vermette is on pace for ~55 points and is a fast skater.

Legwand is on pace for ~35 and is the slowest guy in the NHL - or if he's not, he's close.

Vermette is 16th in the entire NHL in faceoff % - 55.8% to be exact.

While Legwand is in the top...300 or so with a 48% faceoff %.

So speed, puck possession and more production = major upgrade IMO.  Plus a fan favourite for what that's worth (not much I guess).

Legwand has played a lot less minutes with lesser linemates. It's a miracle he has as many points as he does.

I'd rather have Vermette on this team over Legwand 10 times out of 10 because I just like him more. For 3 million, you get about the same thing with Legwand. Particularly if you choose to play him which the Senators have opted not to do.

Probably the best case scenario would be to swap the players one for one but there's still the question of whether or not Vermette would even get any quality minutes. So what's the point?

Ev

Ev
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

Vermette would immediately be our best centre.

PTFlea

PTFlea
Co-Founder
Co-Founder

SeawaySensFan wrote:
SpezDispensed wrote:
SeawaySensFan wrote:
SpezDispensed wrote:Vermette makes a lot of sense.  

I've always been a big fan of Vermette but I'm a bigger fan of the Senators so I'm call it like I see it. Vermette is certainly a slight upgrade on Legwand, a touch younger too, but why would you bring him in when you had basically the same player and chose not to play him?

Well, for one thing Vermette is on pace for ~55 points and is a fast skater.

Legwand is on pace for ~35 and is the slowest guy in the NHL - or if he's not, he's close.

Vermette is 16th in the entire NHL in faceoff % - 55.8% to be exact.

While Legwand is in the top...300 or so with a 48% faceoff %.

So speed, puck possession and more production = major upgrade IMO.  Plus a fan favourite for what that's worth (not much I guess).

Legwand has played a lot less minutes with lesser linemates. It's a miracle he has as many points as he does.

I'd rather have Vermette on this team over Legwand 10 times out of 10 because I just like him more. For 3 million, you get about the same thing with Legwand. Particularly if you choose to play him which the Senators have opted not to do.

Probably the best case scenario would be to swap the players one for one but there's still the question of whether or not Vermette would even get any quality minutes. So what's the point?

True, he gets 5 minutes less a game.  His production is actually not bad when that's considered and his linemates seem to be the dregs.  Top PP minutes though.

Vermette would get quality time because he's a faceoff wizard who can win possession on PPs, ES and particularly PK.

He's slot in really nicely as a 2C or behind Zib eventually IMO.

PTFlea

PTFlea
Co-Founder
Co-Founder

Ev wrote:Vermette would immediately be our best centre.

I don't know if he's better than Turris. I think he'd struggle the same way Turris does if propelled to a top line C position, but he'd be close and that's what we want. Balance up and down the lineup.

SeawaySensFan

SeawaySensFan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

Ev wrote:Vermette would immediately be our best centre.

Probably. That doesn't convince me he would be played in the Top 6 though.

Ev

Ev
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

SpezDispensed wrote:
Ev wrote:Vermette would immediately be our best centre.

I don't know if he's better than Turris.  I think he'd struggle the same way Turris does if propelled to a top line C position, but he'd be close and that's what we want.  Balance up and down the lineup.

He's #1 c in Arizona right now. And last year most likely.

SeawaySensFan

SeawaySensFan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

Ev wrote:
SpezDispensed wrote:
Ev wrote:Vermette would immediately be our best centre.

I don't know if he's better than Turris.  I think he'd struggle the same way Turris does if propelled to a top line C position, but he'd be close and that's what we want.  Balance up and down the lineup.

He's #1 c in Arizona right now. And last year most likely.

And the year before.

NEELY


Mod
Mod

He had some good seasons in Columbus too.

Vermette is a top 6 guy, LH center, plays with speed, and doesn't have a ton of miles on him in all honesty. That could be a free lunch at the end of the day and I am not sure a lot of teams would be willing to give him what he wants on a 4 or 5 years deal. I think the Sens do.

At worst with Vermette you get a #3 center on a good team, works the PK, and brings a little bit of everything, and has playoff experience and for his sake I hope he wins a cup this year.

SeawaySensFan

SeawaySensFan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

NEELY wrote:He had some good seasons in Columbus too.

Vermette is a top 6 guy, LH center, plays with speed, and doesn't have a ton of miles on him in all honesty.  That could be a free lunch at the end of the day and I am not sure a lot of teams would be willing to give him what he wants on a 4 or 5 years deal.  I think the Sens do.

At worst with Vermette you get a #3 center on a good team, works the PK, and brings a little bit of everything, and has playoff experience and for his sake I hope he wins a cup this year.

Based on recent dudlines, teams seem more reluctant to pay for rentals so we could get him cheap in that respect.

NEELY


Mod
Mod

Ev wrote:
NEELY wrote:Stolen from SC.

Quotes from Dreger on Lehner this morning.

“Not really because I don’t think they know what they had yet in Robin Lehner. And that’s the big issue. Teams have called on Robin Lehner. In fact, I think that there’s been communication in the past between the Oilers and Ottawa Senators specific to Robin Lehner.

“But as much as Bryan Murray and the Sens want Robin Lehner to develop into their star goaltender, he’s not doing that yet. So the value in Craig Anderson from a Senators perspective is immeasurable. Maybe things change in terms of his availability as you get closer to the trade deadline, or in the offseason, but right now, if it weren’t for Craig
Anderson, the Ottawa Senators would be a far worse team than what they are right now.”

I think the Sens end up with that Pitt pick for Lehner... just a hunch.


That would be horrible man. You need something tangible and something valuable for him.

To this point again about trading Lehner... it was brought up on the team but maybe they really like Hogberg in Sweden right now and see his development path along the same time Anderson is the starter in Ottawa. I literally know nothing about Hogberg other then he is big and the Sens drafted a goaltender in the 3rd round when they really had zero need to.

If that's the case along with their concerns on and off the ice with Lehner (loose cannon according to some which I think is BS) then why not use Lehner to try and get a piece the Sens need? Just some additional food for thought.

NEELY


Mod
Mod

SeawaySensFan wrote:
NEELY wrote:He had some good seasons in Columbus too.

Vermette is a top 6 guy, LH center, plays with speed, and doesn't have a ton of miles on him in all honesty.  That could be a free lunch at the end of the day and I am not sure a lot of teams would be willing to give him what he wants on a 4 or 5 years deal.  I think the Sens do.

At worst with Vermette you get a #3 center on a good team, works the PK, and brings a little bit of everything, and has playoff experience and for his sake I hope he wins a cup this year.

Based on recent dudlines, teams seem more reluctant to pay for rentals so we could get him cheap in that respect.

Don't think Ottawa adds any UFA's like last year (which was stupid to begin with). I think Phillips is for sure out the door and will get a 3rd or a 4th + 5th kind of thing. Smith I think has some value and could be involved in a deal with Lehner going to Edmonton if they try and snag a guy like Eberle instead of picks.

DefenceWinsChampionships


All-Star
All-Star

NEELY wrote:
SeawaySensFan wrote:
NEELY wrote:He had some good seasons in Columbus too.

Vermette is a top 6 guy, LH center, plays with speed, and doesn't have a ton of miles on him in all honesty.  That could be a free lunch at the end of the day and I am not sure a lot of teams would be willing to give him what he wants on a 4 or 5 years deal.  I think the Sens do.

At worst with Vermette you get a #3 center on a good team, works the PK, and brings a little bit of everything, and has playoff experience and for his sake I hope he wins a cup this year.

Based on recent dudlines, teams seem more reluctant to pay for rentals so we could get him cheap in that respect.

Don't think Ottawa adds any UFA's like last year (which was stupid to begin with). I think Phillips is for sure out the door and will get a 3rd or a 4th + 5th kind of thing. Smith I think has some value and could be involved in a deal with Lehner going to Edmonton if they try and snag a guy like Eberle instead of picks.

Lehner, Smith, Wiercioch, 2nd for Fasth, Eberle? I actually think that's a fair trade...

NEELY


Mod
Mod

Don't think you NEED to throw in a 2nd there, Oilers would be getting guys in their mid 20's, a #3 on their team, a potential top 4 D man who can put up some points, and obviously the center piece being Lehner. Adding a draft pick would be way too much.

All that said I don't think there is a chance Edmonton moves Hall, Eberle, or RNH. Too stubborn.

PTFlea

PTFlea
Co-Founder
Co-Founder

DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:
NEELY wrote:
SeawaySensFan wrote:
NEELY wrote:He had some good seasons in Columbus too.

Vermette is a top 6 guy, LH center, plays with speed, and doesn't have a ton of miles on him in all honesty.  That could be a free lunch at the end of the day and I am not sure a lot of teams would be willing to give him what he wants on a 4 or 5 years deal.  I think the Sens do.

At worst with Vermette you get a #3 center on a good team, works the PK, and brings a little bit of everything, and has playoff experience and for his sake I hope he wins a cup this year.

Based on recent dudlines, teams seem more reluctant to pay for rentals so we could get him cheap in that respect.

Don't think Ottawa adds any UFA's like last year (which was stupid to begin with).  I think Phillips is for sure out the door and will get a 3rd or a 4th + 5th kind of thing.  Smith I think has some value and could be involved in a deal with Lehner going to Edmonton if they try and snag a guy like Eberle instead of picks.

Lehner, Smith, Wiercioch, 2nd for Fasth, Eberle? I actually think that's a fair trade...

Why must we add a 2nd in there? If we do, I'd want a mid-level prospect I think.

Ev

Ev
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

NO TO EBERLE. Overrated. Go for Yakupov for cheap

SeawaySensFan

SeawaySensFan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

SpezDispensed wrote:
DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:
NEELY wrote:
SeawaySensFan wrote:
NEELY wrote:He had some good seasons in Columbus too.

Vermette is a top 6 guy, LH center, plays with speed, and doesn't have a ton of miles on him in all honesty.  That could be a free lunch at the end of the day and I am not sure a lot of teams would be willing to give him what he wants on a 4 or 5 years deal.  I think the Sens do.

At worst with Vermette you get a #3 center on a good team, works the PK, and brings a little bit of everything, and has playoff experience and for his sake I hope he wins a cup this year.

Based on recent dudlines, teams seem more reluctant to pay for rentals so we could get him cheap in that respect.

Don't think Ottawa adds any UFA's like last year (which was stupid to begin with).  I think Phillips is for sure out the door and will get a 3rd or a 4th + 5th kind of thing.  Smith I think has some value and could be involved in a deal with Lehner going to Edmonton if they try and snag a guy like Eberle instead of picks.

Lehner, Smith, Wiercioch, 2nd for Fasth, Eberle? I actually think that's a fair trade...

Why must we add a 2nd in there?  If we do, I'd want a mid-level prospect I think.  

Only MacT knows the answer to that.

So is that 2nd a deal breaker? Do you say "if I have to give you a 2nd instead of a mid-level prospect, the deal is off?" Are you guaranteed to draft something better than a mid-level prospect with that pick?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 9 of 67]

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 6 ... 8, 9, 10 ... 38 ... 67  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum