Source?
GM Hockey
TheAvatar wrote:Source?
NEELY wrote:Stolen from SC.
Quotes from Dreger on Lehner this morning.
“Not really because I don’t think they know what they had yet in Robin Lehner. And that’s the big issue. Teams have called on Robin Lehner. In fact, I think that there’s been communication in the past between the Oilers and Ottawa Senators specific to Robin Lehner.
“But as much as Bryan Murray and the Sens want Robin Lehner to develop into their star goaltender, he’s not doing that yet. So the value in Craig Anderson from a Senators perspective is immeasurable. Maybe things change in terms of his availability as you get closer to the trade deadline, or in the offseason, but right now, if it weren’t for Craig
Anderson, the Ottawa Senators would be a far worse team than what they are right now.”
I think the Sens end up with that Pitt pick for Lehner... just a hunch.
NEELY wrote:This is just my train of thought, if they do move him for that 1st it's a lot easier and justifiable to move that pick OR Ottawa's 1st in a trade for a guy like ROR. You have that additional pick and you are still getting a prospect one way or another and you have 2 2nds to play with as well.
Yah, it doesn't help the Sens right now but fact of the matter is that 1st does have value and if you are dealing Lehner you need value back even if it isn't an asset that will help you right now. There are 2 or 3 places Ottawa can move Lehner if they do decide to move him and IMO Edmonton probably has the best deal to offer in terms of value.
Pitt 1st and Scrivins/Fasth for Lehner, about as good as you can get for an unproven goaltender with tons of potential. Not ideal but he's not getting the net in Ottawa from Anderson. Anderson is the guy and will be for a long time IMO and obviously a lot of others. Don't agree with this line of thinking but it is what it is.
Ev wrote:NEELY wrote:Stolen from SC.
Quotes from Dreger on Lehner this morning.
“Not really because I don’t think they know what they had yet in Robin Lehner. And that’s the big issue. Teams have called on Robin Lehner. In fact, I think that there’s been communication in the past between the Oilers and Ottawa Senators specific to Robin Lehner.
“But as much as Bryan Murray and the Sens want Robin Lehner to develop into their star goaltender, he’s not doing that yet. So the value in Craig Anderson from a Senators perspective is immeasurable. Maybe things change in terms of his availability as you get closer to the trade deadline, or in the offseason, but right now, if it weren’t for Craig
Anderson, the Ottawa Senators would be a far worse team than what they are right now.”
I think the Sens end up with that Pitt pick for Lehner... just a hunch.
That would be horrible man. You need something tangible and something valuable for him.
NEELY wrote:This is just my train of thought, if they do move him for that 1st it's a lot easier and justifiable to move that pick OR Ottawa's 1st in a trade for a guy like ROR. You have that additional pick and you are still getting a prospect one way or another and you have 2 2nds to play with as well.
Yah, it doesn't help the Sens right now but fact of the matter is that 1st does have value and if you are dealing Lehner you need value back even if it isn't an asset that will help you right now. There are 2 or 3 places Ottawa can move Lehner if they do decide to move him and IMO Edmonton probably has the best deal to offer in terms of value.
Pitt 1st and Scrivins/Fasth for Lehner, about as good as you can get for an unproven goaltender with tons of potential. Not ideal but he's not getting the net in Ottawa from Anderson. Anderson is the guy and will be for a long time IMO and obviously a lot of others. Don't agree with this line of thinking but it is what it is.
DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:NEELY wrote:This is just my train of thought, if they do move him for that 1st it's a lot easier and justifiable to move that pick OR Ottawa's 1st in a trade for a guy like ROR. You have that additional pick and you are still getting a prospect one way or another and you have 2 2nds to play with as well.
Yah, it doesn't help the Sens right now but fact of the matter is that 1st does have value and if you are dealing Lehner you need value back even if it isn't an asset that will help you right now. There are 2 or 3 places Ottawa can move Lehner if they do decide to move him and IMO Edmonton probably has the best deal to offer in terms of value.
Pitt 1st and Scrivins/Fasth for Lehner, about as good as you can get for an unproven goaltender with tons of potential. Not ideal but he's not getting the net in Ottawa from Anderson. Anderson is the guy and will be for a long time IMO and obviously a lot of others. Don't agree with this line of thinking but it is what it is.
Gotta be careful with ROR. He's making $6M and is a UFA the year after.
- No guarantees he re-signs in Ottawa
- No guarantees Ottawa can afford him if he wants to test FA
- We'd have to give up a lot to trade for him
- Do we really want him as our 3LC with Pageau, Lazar, Da Costa in the mix?
The Sens have struggled this year because they've been forced to play 5-6 guys because of their contracts, not because of their skill. Nice to see Michalek come on as of late, but Neil, Phillips, Legwand, Greening, Smith all need to go for this team to improve. Wideman, Prince, Puempel, Robinson deserve good looks next season, but still don't think they'll make the team based on the number of bodies/contracts in the organization. The Sens should be aiming to go into camp next year with their top 9 figured out, and try to move past the 'rugged' player mentality. Focus should be on being able to roll three lines with an equal threat of scoring and defensive responsibility, with an 'energy' fourth line that can score greasy goals.
To Edmonton:
Lehner, Chiasson (RFA), Wiercioch
To Ottawa:
Eberle, Fasth (UFA)
MacArthur-Turris-Eberle
Hoffman-Zib-Ryan
Puempel-Lazar-Stone
Michalek-Pageau-Condra
Robinson
Methot-Karlsson
Cowen-Ceci
Boro-Gryba
Wideman
NEELY wrote:.... Edm has Pitts 1st rounder.
NEELY wrote:Don't have to look at a trade with Edmonton as getting the player you want back, you get an asset back that you can then move for the player you want. Fact is Colorado doesn't want a goalie, they have one. ROR is not resigning in Colorado. How many teams can give up picks and prospects and potentially a D man for ROR? Hell, who has the cap room to add him on top of all that. Who has a big a need for a LH top 6 center/winger than Ottawa?
That's how I look at any deal involving Lehner because I think there's only 1 place he goes and you take the best and most useful asset you can from the Oilers and that's a Pitt 1st or Edm's own 2nd rounder (difference is marginal at this point).
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum