I'd still like to see where Shannon ranks in all the shootout shooters in the league. 25% is quite good for a shootout shooter, 33% is very good, 45%+ would be considered elite.
GM Hockey
Last edited by Big Ev on Mon Mar 28, 2011 3:05 pm; edited 1 time in total
SpezDispenser wrote:I'd still like to see where Shannon ranks in all the shootout shooters in the league. 25% is quite good for a shootout shooter, 33% is very good, 45%+ would be considered elite.
Michallica wrote:man look at all those guys under shannon....I guess then if we had all those guys on the team, shannon should technically go ahead of them because he has a higher percentage?
Malkin, Jagr, Sedin, Sharp, Vermette, Ryan, St. Louis, Stamkos....all under the percentage of shannon. So I ask Tim, would you send Ryan Shannon before any of these guys?
SpezDispenser wrote:I'd still like to see where Shannon ranks in all the shootout shooters in the league. 25% is quite good for a shootout shooter, 33% is very good, 45%+ would be considered elite.
Michallica wrote:man look at all those guys under shannon....I guess then if we had all those guys on the team, shannon should technically go ahead of them because he has a higher percentage?
Malkin, Jagr, Sedin, Sharp, Vermette, Ryan, St. Louis, Stamkos....all under the percentage of shannon. So I ask Tim, would you send Ryan Shannon before any of these guys?
tim1_2 wrote:Michallica wrote:man look at all those guys under shannon....I guess then if we had all those guys on the team, shannon should technically go ahead of them because he has a higher percentage?
Malkin, Jagr, Sedin, Sharp, Vermette, Ryan, St. Louis, Stamkos....all under the percentage of shannon. So I ask Tim, would you send Ryan Shannon before any of these guys?
I would try whatever it takes to find a winning formula. That means trying everything until I find guys that can consistently score above the league average of 32%. Some good players are just NOT great in the shootout (Alfie, Spezza, Heatley).
tim1_2 wrote:This is nonsense for reasons I already stated. The AVERAGE shooting % in a shootout is 32%. Therefore, 25% is BELOW AVERAGE. You can't say that 25% is "quite good" when it is below average. Now you're just ignoring already-stated facts which is making me insane.
tim1_2 wrote:Michallica wrote:
Interesting....I for sure thought spezza and alfie were worse at it considering how much they miss. Again, that's just one point about percentages, but what about who has the scoring touch? I'll ask you the same question I asked big ev....who would you have tried besides shannon, keeping hindsight out of the discussion? and shannon was the first extra guy...you make it sound like he was the main guy for clouston.
I would've tried the kids...Butler (0/1 lifetime), Greening, and Condra. I know that they might not have the best hands in the world, but I think given their play of late, they warranted a look. It's next to impossible to know how someone will perform in the shootout until they are in an actual shootout (and I don't mean the practice variety).
I'd rather try players with no statistical record in the NHL than a guy who is below the statistical average in the NHL (Shannon).
Hoags wrote:Our team just happens to be made of players who aren't very good at the shootout. They either need to practice them more or acquire players who are good.
What we currently have isn't working but Anderson should improve our W/L in the shootout a fair bit.
We're clearing just going by the numbers but there's no harm in changing things up. Whatever we're doing this year is clearly not working.
SpezDispenser wrote:wprager wrote:
I'm simply asking (and, by the way, the question was aimed at SpezD) why he thought some clearly that Muller was better when facts imply that this cannot be determined objectively at this point in time.
I'm fighting FOR Clouston right now, not against. If I had to choose a guy over Clouston, it would be Muller - not because he has experience, he doesn't, but every single report/write-up on him says that he's calm, collected, and brings an amazing resume as a player, has coached in the AHL and has now cached in one of the most hostile markets as an assistant. If we don't get him (assuming Clouston is let go), then someone else will - and I think we'd regret it.
But...we all know now that none of us can predict coaches and how they will do in this market.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum