Flo The Action wrote:I'm not saying the contrary but I must admit that with a guy like silf that was touted by the organization as being NHL ready 2 years ago my expectations of him were a bit higher. on the other hand I expected a learning curve from Zib and stone. Stone was such a big boy in the juniors but now the competition is more on par with his size. still like it's been said. let's have another 10 games or so for them to mesh together. it is great to see Hoffman do so well. he could very well end up as a 3rd liner that can help with secondary scoring.sandysensfan wrote:wprager wrote:sandysensfan wrote:Flo The Action wrote:sens lose tonight. maybe it's early but i for one, was expecting a slightly more impressive start to this team. granted I haven't been able to watch them yet online.
They are one of the youngest teams in the AHL. They will need time to get used to each other.. several new players... and a new coach and a new system. Injuries to Cowen, Gryba & Stone haven't helped either... Bishop was in net tonight... backup was Lawson (who I thought was in Elmira). Just hoping Lehner got the night off and praying it's not something else.
Lehner had a touch of the flu.
Thanks for that..
I heard Tim Murray or was it Pierre Dorion during an interview earlier this season. They said some AHL teams focus on the development and playing time of their young players... while other teams just focus on winning. I wonder what NHL teams would benefit most from. For me it would be the development... Winning (ie Championships) is nice but that means veteran AHL teams for the most part.
A winning culture is good for young players.. but development is better. Let the young guys play...
The team never hypes their players as big time scorers
That's just what fans assume and then they expect them to put up big point totals. Silf for example will most likely never put up more than 50 points in an average year. Being NHL ready doesn't mean you're going to dominate the AHL offensively