111519 wrote:
This is exactly the problem, people say "don't trade our future prospects", and I agree to some point BUT, don't say future prospects (guys that will develop in the next 3-5 years) and then act as if alfie who is 36, phillips who is 31, will be around and productive at that time. You can't have it both ways-you go for it now with alfie, kovalev, neil, rutuu, kuba, and phillips, (all over 30) or you trade for youth, to develop with your emerging prospects-karlsson, cowen, spezza, michalek, fisher, foligno, shannon, volchenkov, brodeur, leclaire, etc.
Hockey is cyclical, and if you don't make changes, nothing changes....
When you look at those options and names, I know what I would do. I don't want to trade the future I want to build it.
How about something like
To Calgary
phillips
cheechoo
3rd round pick
To Ottawa
Phaneuf
Can you imagine the excitement, can you imagine our defence in three years
The problem is it's really hard to make a trade of that magnitude. Number one, Cheechoo is a negative value - and I mean that - if you add him into a package, you have to add a 2nd rounder for someone to accept him. Phillips has a NTC and is a shutdown guy, so he's really redundant with Regher there. And the 3rd is insulting considering Phaneuf is a young, talented D-man.
For Phaneuf it's Spezza or Michalek straight up. MAYBE a Foligno, Regin, 1st package would do it, but that's also debatable.