Wouldn't be surprised if they moved Methot trough it all too but if they are looking to win within 2 years then that changes things in my mind if Methot was ever to be traded.
GM Hockey
I think the idea with trading those two is that they aren't buying in with the game plan and team strategy. although i personally doubt they move Kane unless the return is equal.NEELY wrote:Flo The Action wrote:NEELY wrote:Winnipeg needs a long term plan and they need to rebuild, don't think anyone would disagree with that. They need to get younger and they need to get the cancer out of there in Byfuglin and Kane as well.
Ladd is a long shot but I wouldn't want anyone else off that roster.
ya maybe so but is that how they see it? it's not what i'm seeing. i mean yes they should rebuild to some degree. doubt they send ladd out of town. but byf and kane(without improvement) within the next year, probably by the trade deadline for Byf
If they are willing to move Kane and Byfuglien they aren't trying to win now. Def a move to get pieces in the future.
NEELY wrote:Wouldn't be surprised if they moved Methot trough it all too but if they are looking to win within 2 years then that changes things in my mind if Methot was ever to be traded.
I hope it doesn't get to that but you have to consider that I guess. talk about a return on investement Foligno==> Methot(solid years with karlsson)==> Ladd ==>CupNEELY wrote:If there was a Ladd for Methot deal I wouldn't hesitate.
Hoags wrote:The team isn't in a playoff position and it's far from guaranteed they'll even make it in and they are going all in?
I'd understand if they were at the top of the East.
Hoags wrote:The team isn't in a playoff position and it's far from guaranteed they'll even make it in and they are going all in?
I'd understand if they were at the top of the East.
well we might need to add to get there.Hoags wrote:The team isn't in a playoff position and it's far from guaranteed they'll even make it in and they are going all in?
I'd understand if they were at the top of the East.
Ev wrote:Actually relevant now, congrats SSF
Flo The Action wrote:well we might need to add to get there.Hoags wrote:The team isn't in a playoff position and it's far from guaranteed they'll even make it in and they are going all in?
I'd understand if they were at the top of the East.
besides like neely said, it's pretty clear who's the core by now. if you can add to that good players by trading the others packaged with picks and prospects you have the starting point to becoming a contender.
SeawaySensFan wrote:Flo The Action wrote:well we might need to add to get there.Hoags wrote:The team isn't in a playoff position and it's far from guaranteed they'll even make it in and they are going all in?
I'd understand if they were at the top of the East.
besides like neely said, it's pretty clear who's the core by now. if you can add to that good players by trading the others packaged with picks and prospects you have the starting point to becoming a contender.
Not only like NEELY said but like Murray said. They basically already have the "keep" and "buh-bye" piles sorted out. BONANZA to follow.
NEELY wrote:Sens are missing a big, mean, goal scoring power forward. They don't need a annual 30 goal guy but someone who is a difference maker. I'll just say Ladd again.
BM did mention it be a top 6 forward....Michallica wrote:NEELY wrote:Sens are missing a big, mean, goal scoring power forward. They don't need a annual 30 goal guy but someone who is a difference maker. I'll just say Ladd again.
Bigg Buff is who I'm thinking of...just can't see jets parting with Ladd
Flo The Action wrote:BM did mention it be a top 6 forward....Michallica wrote:NEELY wrote:Sens are missing a big, mean, goal scoring power forward. They don't need a annual 30 goal guy but someone who is a difference maker. I'll just say Ladd again.
Bigg Buff is who I'm thinking of...just can't see jets parting with Ladd
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum