To me you have to draft a player that's got the possibility to be a high scorer even if there's a chance to bust. We need top line players even 3 years down the road as the system's full of roll players and we've got secondary scorers.
GM Hockey
LeKing wrote:Have a look at this.
http://hfboards.hockeysfuture.com/showthread.php?t=1452789
Tells you how different teams' lists are compared to general consensus
And Gillis still hhas a job
Ev wrote:if you think Zibanejad for example is a role player then you aren't getting a top line forward at 17
No zib is top 6 scoring forward. You can find 30 goal scorers at 17 but you might be taking a risk that they don't work out as say if you're drafting top 5. Personally that's why I want Domi. Doubt he's around at 17 but I hope we trade up for him.Ev wrote:if you think Zibanejad for example is a role player then you aren't getting a top line forward at 17
LeKing wrote:Looks like there are 2 guys they like at 17 and they think one of them is gonna be there.
LeKing wrote:Domi is definitely the perfect fit and he's a leftie.
But no way he is there at 17.
I'd trade any of our prospects not playing in the NHL yet added to the 17th just to move up to get him. Well maybe not Noesen:l:
LeKing wrote:Domi is definitely the perfect fit and he's a leftie.
But no way he is there at 17.
I'd trade any of our prospects not playing in the NHL yet added to the 17th just to move up to get him. Well maybe not Noesen:l:
Ev wrote:LeKing wrote:Domi is definitely the perfect fit and he's a leftie.
But no way he is there at 17.
I'd trade any of our prospects not playing in the NHL yet added to the 17th just to move up to get him. Well maybe not Noesen:l:
I wouldn't touch Puemps.
LeKing wrote:Ev wrote:if you think Zibanejad for example is a role player then you aren't getting a top line forward at 17
I think there's always a top line forward that comes out every year after the top 15.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|