Tukker wrote:
for every zetterurg there's a daigle
True that, my friend, true that.
Anyway, beddy-bye time for me. I'm spent. Cheers.
Tukker wrote:
for every zetterurg there's a daigle
im tryin to get my cycle back, so im up all night :Drooneypoo wrote:Tukker wrote:
for every zetterurg there's a daigle
True that, my friend, true that.
Anyway, beddy-bye time for me. I'm spent. Cheers.
Tukker wrote:Murray already built the ducks, they're called..... the ducks504Heater wrote:Tukker wrote:
good to know :bounce:
Friggin Murray is building the Ducks here. It's pretty obvious.
rooneypoo wrote:
Hmmm. I find your Schubert comparison puzzling. Reading around on Picard, I get the impression that he's kind of a Brian Lee type player, but without the same defensive poise. Plenty of reliable sources -- including Dobber -- give him a good offensive upside (40+ point ability), but mention his lack of physicality, his 'big player playing a small player game' complex. If he's addressed the latter issue without sacrificing any of the former, he might be a very decent prospect after all.
murray built the team that won the cup :D504Heater wrote:Tukker wrote:Murray already built the ducks, they're called..... the ducks504Heater wrote:Tukker wrote:
good to know :bounce:
Friggin Murray is building the Ducks here. It's pretty obvious.
:D True enough...
Tukker wrote:murray built the team that won the cup :D504Heater wrote:Tukker wrote:Murray already built the ducks, they're called..... the ducks504Heater wrote:Tukker wrote:
good to know :bounce:
Friggin Murray is building the Ducks here. It's pretty obvious.
:D True enough...
murray built alot of they're depth thoughwprager wrote:Tukker wrote:murray built the team that won the cup :D504Heater wrote:Tukker wrote:Murray already built the ducks, they're called..... the ducks504Heater wrote:Tukker wrote:
good to know :bounce:
Friggin Murray is building the Ducks here. It's pretty obvious.
:D True enough...
Next we'll be adding a "Church of Murray" link on the right. Let's not canonize the man yet. True, he had a hand in building the Ducks, but where would that team be without Niedermayer and Pronger (I'm not giving Burke credit here -- those were very lucky happenstances) and without the resurgence of Selanne? I'm not doubting Murray is good, but he's not great yet.
P.S. Tukker, that wwas meant not meant strictly as a reply to you.
rooneypoo wrote:
[EDIT: don't even both with Sensjunkie, actually. He thinks Picard's a winger... !]
504Heater wrote:
This sentiment is coming from a lot of fans on HFBoards. At the very least we know that the fans held him in very high regard and that Murray did as well. I think we're in for a really good player here. Like Schubert+. It's random takes right now, but this is what I'm getting.
rooneypoo wrote:
Just to follow up on this conversation from last night, re: Picard, physical player or not?
It's starting to sound like you are indeed right about this (yay!). Here's what the Ottawa Citizen's article on the Meszaros trade had to say:
"Picard is well known to hockey fans across the Ottawa River. Originally
drafted by the Philadelphia Flyers, he was impressive after joining the
Lightning in a trade late last season, scoring three goals and three
assists in 20 games. He also showcased his 6-2, 220-pound frame
physically and is expected to make his mark with solid bodychecking for
the Senators."
http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/sports/senators/story.html?id=5e945aea-62f3-49cd-9ed4-e6630f15324a
That's a very different Picard than I've been reading about lately... and for the better!
GM Hockey » Breaking Rumours!! » Member's Story breakers! » Mezaros to TB for Kuba, Picard and a 1st
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|