tim1_2 wrote:PTFlea wrote:Ev wrote:Diddle Turris, everything going right for him here and he puts his foot in the sand.
I don't understand his stance. He Cussed up something that was SO right for him here. What a shame for him IMO. Nashville will be great, but he had it all here. One of the captains, fans loved him, trusted by the coach, great icetime, good linemates.
What the Diddle was he thinking? All about the $$ this time and for the sake of a million or two he really tarnished something nice he had here.
You can't assume that Turris is at fault here. Maybe the Sens brass didn't see him in the long-term plans, low-balled him knowing he'd refuse, and then use that as the public rationale to trade him.
I heard both Booboo and someone else (Dreger?) mention how Overhardt was a hard man to negotiate with. Pretty sure if they were offering 5 that a compromise could be reached at 6, but if the guy is going to play hardball and keep insisting on 7, and likely asking for a higher salary to offset the tax situation and the losses (versus market) on the previous contract, then you just can't make a deal.
Remember, Alfie got less from Detroit than he would have received from Ottawa. He was never going to get a "top-up" to his previous contract and ended up tarnishing his legacy and uprooting his family for zero gain.
When players sign a contract they get paid regardless of if they are overperforming or underperforming. Will Ryan offer a sub-market deal when his contract expires to make up for being paid a few million above his production? From the organization's standpoint they win on some contracts and lose on others. If you top-up players who were underpaid then they will lose on all contracts.