Proven winner in college =/= proven winner in the NHL. Elliott is like Dan Ellis, he's decent but he'll never be a true #1 goalie. They are actually carbon copies of eachother.
GM Hockey
Elliott or Leclaire - Who's Number 1?
Hoags wrote:The thinking seems to be that only Leclaire has the potential to backstop this team to the playoffs and beyond. You don't need elite goaltending to win but you do need solid and competent goaltending.
I'd say it's unlikely but possible that Wamsley can fix the issues with Leclaire's game. Leclaire is also going to need to get into a groove, if he sucks or gets injured that won't happen. We didn't really have a good steady goalie coach last year. I don't know if Eli Wilson was a bad coach but it wasn't working out. So there's some hope that Wamsley (who has a history with Leclaire) can get results.
Elliott isn't getting enough credit, he was great last year he struggled in the playoffs but it was his first time and his first full season. Roche you should post a few thoughts on Elliott someday, I love your input on this forum. I'm not too worried about Elliott, I think he'll be solid, only a question if he can improve on last year. So far he's been improving his game with us.
With all the Vokoun talk, I have to wonder should we really pay big money for a 3-4 year NMC contract for a #1 goalie ? What if Lehner is ready before then ? We'll have a situation like Boston and Thomas.
Bottom Line: There's good reason to be concerned about our goaltending, but no reason to panic yet.
PKC wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:Let me get this straight: Leclaire is a goalie who depends on athleticism to make saves.
But he's not athletic at all according to the boot camp training...
Good stuff.
Those bootcamps are based on strength more than athleticism. I don't think they had any flexibility contests while they were there, is what I'm trying to say.
Big Ev wrote:Proven winner in college =/= proven winner in the NHL. Elliott is like Dan Ellis, he's decent but he'll never be a true #1 goalie. They are actually carbon copies of eachother.
CockRoche wrote:Big Ev wrote:Proven winner in college =/= proven winner in the NHL. Elliott is like Dan Ellis, he's decent but he'll never be a true #1 goalie. They are actually carbon copies of eachother.
That is a great comparison. But I think you are selling both goalies short, they are still young and worked their asses off to get where they are, give them time and the proper situation, they could establish themselves as #1's.
I think you will see Ellis be one of the many bright spots in Tampa Bay this season. He will get the chance to prove you wrong. Time will tell.
Michallica wrote:siiiick. see the dumb smirk on DB's face who's got obsolutely no idea what to say next...clouston's a smart guy. he knows what's up and who's the rat who wants to attack his players in the MSM
wprager wrote:This little exchange reminds me of "So you're an expert". Oh, the warm memories.
SensGirl11 wrote:I just hope for once (since Hasek) that we can actually comfortably watch a game without the thought of "when's that next goal against coming?" It's very hard to enjoy a game and enjoy a lead when you know that at any second your goalie is going to crap everywhere and lose you the game. The problem in pre-season was not our forwards but our Goalies. How much do they need us to score to win us a damned game?
With that said, I think the best bet for us to do anything this year is to go with Elliott and stick with him. Sucks for Melnyk to be paying Pascal 3.8 but what can you do. It's a risk Murray took and it obviously blew up in his face. Thank goodness we got Lehner out of that trade, it's the only good thing that came out of it and we now have our goaltender of the future. ( )
Hoags wrote:Clouston is just awesome on so many levels.
His contract is up this year I hope the Sens extend him (Murray hinted as such).
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum