AlfieisGod11 wrote:Is anyone concerned about goaltending? Elliott has played good enough
to win. I'm afraid that he's not a goalie we should move forward with
as a regular starter come, say, next year. The playoffs with Elliott
are what frighten me. Do you think Murray makes an offer for one of
Nashville's young goalies, or another restricted goalie out there?
An interesting trade would be Dan Ellis for Leclaire to get the cost down, but in terms of Elliott being the guy, I would say this season REALLY bodes well for us and for him. He started well, lost it when Leclaire went down, but then came back with a vengeance and now has a 2.59 GAA and a .910 save %. That's all you can realistically ask for with a guy in his 2nd NHL season. Anything more than that and you've got a legit elite goalie who's in line for 5 million a year.
I like that Elliott's kept his team in it for the last two months +. I wasn't thrilled with how he played when Leclaire went down, but I'm happy that he rebounded and seems ready to take the ball and run with it.
Also, keep in mind that Leclaire was JUST starting to become a rock-solid starter for us when Fisher nailed him. On a good day, the Sens have top 10 goaltending (debatable, I realize), on a bad day, it's still top 15-17, which is good enough to cover some mistakes and keep us in pressured games.
For the first time in a long time I'm okay with our goaltending. I'd like to trade Leclaire for Ellis or someone a little cheaper, but really, Leclaire will turn out to be a massive piece of our puzzle IMO.