shabbs wrote:11 15 19....
Keep looking at it...
Yes...
See it?
EDIT: He may have to change it if we move Heatley though. Heh heh.
:h:
shabbs wrote:11 15 19....
Keep looking at it...
Yes...
See it?
EDIT: He may have to change it if we move Heatley though. Heh heh.
Zoolander wrote:shabbs wrote:11 15 19....
Keep looking at it...
Yes...
See it?
EDIT: He may have to change it if we move Heatley though. Heh heh.
:h:
Ahhh... perhaps it's one he's used on other boards before?wprager wrote:Guys, I'm not a moron. I know what it stands for, I just don't know why. If he had joined 3 months ago or before, sure, but given what we have all been talking about lately, why is 15 still there?
Zoolander wrote:shabbs wrote:11 15 19....
Keep looking at it...
Yes...
See it?
EDIT: He may have to change it if we move Heatley though. Heh heh.
:h:
SensFan71 wrote:Just a small blurb from his latest blog, which more or less was just a rehash of nothing on the Heatley front. I did notice the last part, copied below that is a point of interest.
I keep reading in other locations that the Senators have interest in forward PJ Axelsson but thus far I've yet to hear anything concrete on this front.
Question is, do we want a guy that is 34, his cap hit last year was about 1.85 million, seems to be on a decline, 30 points in 75 games last year. Bertuzzi's cap his last year was 1.95 in comparison, and he had 44 points in 66 games, 15 of them goals and he plays a tougher style than Axelsson.
davetherave wrote:SensFan71 wrote:Just a small blurb from his latest blog, which more or less was just a rehash of nothing on the Heatley front. I did notice the last part, copied below that is a point of interest.
I keep reading in other locations that the Senators have interest in forward PJ Axelsson but thus far I've yet to hear anything concrete on this front.
Question is, do we want a guy that is 34, his cap hit last year was about 1.85 million, seems to be on a decline, 30 points in 75 games last year. Bertuzzi's cap his last year was 1.95 in comparison, and he had 44 points in 66 games, 15 of them goals and he plays a tougher style than Axelsson.
Per your points...why would the Senators want Axelsson? And how do they afford him if they're already over the cap?
Per your points...why would the Senators want Axelsson? And how do they afford him if they're already over the cap?
PKC wrote:davetherave wrote:[Per your points...why would the Senators want Axelsson? And how do they afford him if they're already over the cap?
Even if we could afford him, why would we want him? What dimension does he bring to this team of which we don't already have 100000 forwards capable of bringing.
Also, as most other forums have sort of inside jokes, you know at HB all trade proposals for a while were Ryder, Halak and a 2nd for pretty much anyone and everyone. I think the appropriate response from now on to all of your posts will involve some sort of reference to your team's cap situation.
A reply like this to your post for instance is what I'm talking about:
Per your points...why would the Senators want Axelsson? And how do they afford him if they're already over the cap?
LOL LOL LOL LOL what about Chicago's cap? HAHAHA LMAO ROFL LMAO LOL LOL
It's a new technique I call "measured trolling".
davetherave wrote:
Per your points...why would the Senators want Axelsson? And how do they afford him if they're already over the cap?
davetherave wrote:
I asked a legitimate question about Axelsson.
You decided to be a jerk about it.
What does Chicago's cap have to do with Ottawa's...or are you so thin-skinned now that only Sens fans are allowed to ask these questions?
davetherave wrote:PKC wrote:davetherave wrote:[Per your points...why would the Senators want Axelsson? And how do they afford him if they're already over the cap?
Even if we could afford him, why would we want him? What dimension does he bring to this team of which we don't already have 100000 forwards capable of bringing.
Also, as most other forums have sort of inside jokes, you know at HB all trade proposals for a while were Ryder, Halak and a 2nd for pretty much anyone and everyone. I think the appropriate response from now on to all of your posts will involve some sort of reference to your team's cap situation.
A reply like this to your post for instance is what I'm talking about:
Per your points...why would the Senators want Axelsson? And how do they afford him if they're already over the cap?
LOL LOL LOL LOL what about Chicago's cap? HAHAHA LMAO ROFL LMAO LOL LOL
It's a new technique I call "measured trolling".
I asked a legitimate question about Axelsson.
You decided to be a jerk about it.
What does Chicago's cap have to do with Ottawa's...or are you so thin-skinned now that only Sens fans are allowed to ask these questions?
Neely4Life wrote:This site is starting to get exremely stupid. For a while, a long while, there were no posts like "LOLOLOL" and "hahahaha". Now, we have actually gone into the "well, what about your team" BS.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|