Pierre McGuire is a *%&@*^&@*@%^&

pgood wrote:

PKC wrote:This all really comes as a surprise to me. Why you ask? Well for a guy who's sucked on Crosby's dick for so long, I'm almost stunned that he still has vocal chords.

I think we are all forgetting about the guy McGuire has the biggest hard on for... forget Crosby or Ovechkin, he was blowing Dion Phaneuf well before he ever got on his knees for the other two.

The very first season he awarded his "Monster of the Year" he gave it to Phaneuf in his rookie year over Chara. And I think, Chara was more deserving of said meaningless award, though I must admit to having a bias on that subject. Points wise Chara had 6 less points in 11 less games that year, and managed better numbers in I think all other major statistical categories that year.

Bass Destruction wrote:

pgood wrote:

PKC wrote:This all really comes as a surprise to me. Why you ask? Well for a guy who's sucked on Crosby's dick for so long, I'm almost stunned that he still has vocal chords.

I think we are all forgetting about the guy McGuire has the biggest hard on for... forget Crosby or Ovechkin, he was blowing Dion Phaneuf well before he ever got on his knees for the other two.

The very first season he awarded his "Monster of the Year" he gave it to Phaneuf in his rookie year over Chara. And I think, Chara was more deserving of said meaningless award, though I must admit to having a bias on that subject. Points wise Chara had 6 less points in 11 less games that year, and managed better numbers in I think all other major statistical categories that year.

I remember when Phaneuf was playing for the world juniors, McGuire said something uber creepy, something along the lines of "You guys should see this guy in the locker room" referring to how ripped he is, but it came out all weird and creepy, like the old guy from family guy creepy.

SeawaySensFan wrote:

504Heater wrote:

wprager wrote:
To be fair, the winning goal should have been called off because Foligno hooked the Washington player off the puck. His stick may not have bent like AO's did on Wichester but I couldn't believe they let it go. And 2-3 seconds later the puck's in the net.

I thought so too.

Since we're having a fair-fest here, Heatley's second goal should have been the winner.

wprager wrote:

SeawaySensFan wrote:

504Heater wrote:

wprager wrote:
To be fair, the winning goal should have been called off because Foligno hooked the Washington player off the puck. His stick may not have bent like AO's did on Wichester but I couldn't believe they let it go. And 2-3 seconds later the puck's in the net.

I thought so too.

Since we're having a fair-fest here, Heatley's second goal should have been the winner.

Speaking of goals kicked in

Anyone see the Habs' (Higgins?) goal? I saw a kicking motion -- he pivoted the foot so that the back end of the blade would direct the puck in. I've seen goals kicked into the net in soccer using just as little movement. Anyhow, it didn't affect the outcome but I can't believe they let that one count. This whole rule needs to be tossed out. Since when is it OK to turn your skate to steer the puck in?

wprager wrote:

SeawaySensFan wrote:

504Heater wrote:

wprager wrote:
To be fair, the winning goal should have been called off because Foligno hooked the Washington player off the puck. His stick may not have bent like AO's did on Wichester but I couldn't believe they let it go. And 2-3 seconds later the puck's in the net.

I thought so too.

Since we're having a fair-fest here, Heatley's second goal should have been the winner.

Speaking of goals kicked in

Anyone see the Habs' (Higgins?) goal? I saw a kicking motion -- he pivoted the foot so that the back end of the blade would direct the puck in. I've seen goals kicked into the net in soccer using just as little movement. Anyhow, it didn't affect the outcome but I can't believe they let that one count. This whole rule needs to be tossed out. Since when is it OK to turn your skate to steer the puck in?