GM Hockey
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
GM Hockey

You are not connected. Please login or register

GAME DAY: Ottawa Senators @ Toronto Maple Leafs - 7:00pm Oct. 25th, 2008

+14
Cronie
Number Twenty Nine
The Silfer Server
dennycrane
asq2
PKC
TheAvatar
PTFlea
LethalLehner
Sens4thecup
Riprock
mattshock
wprager
shabbs
18 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Go down  Message [Page 10 of 10]

wprager


Administrator
Administrator

rooneypoo wrote:I think everyone needs to take a deep breath.

We're eight -- eight! -- games into the season, with another 74 games still to come. Yes, we look like Donkey out there right now, but it's called growing pains. Clearly, our defensive and offensive schemes haven't been fully implemented as of yet, and I wouldn't be surprised if they only start to click in the next 8-10 games. It's going to take time for everyone to adjust. Frankly, sucking at the start isn't totally a bad thing. It means you face adversity early and, if you learn to overcome it, you're a stronger team for having gone through it.

The Commodore/Stillman trade last year showed us how effective it is to bring in help on a team that, overall, hasn't yet sorted itself out. I definitely think we could use a Dman -- the Richardson experiment absolutely has to end -- but now is decidedly not the time to make that move, when we're weak and vulnerable (and liable to be taken advantage of and/or make reactionary moves), and when that new player would step into a disastrous situation. Reactionary moves almost never pay off, and they give the whole team the impression that the organization is in a panic and has no faith in its current players, and that doesn't help anything.

We've got a lot of good, young players here and it's ridiculous to say that eight games have given us enough information to determine whether this or that guy needs to be shipped out. Relax especially on Picard: I agree I shouldn't be playing top 4 minutes as he's too sloppy in his own end, and I hate that pairing with Kuba 5 on 5, but he's got all kinds of offensive potential, and with Kuba, he's the only other guy we have who can do something with the puck in the other team's end. We need to insulate him by pairing him with a strong defensive partner (a guy like Smith) 5 on 5 and throw as much PP at him as he can handle.

Anyway, it may be time to take a lesson from Ron Wilson's play book: if your top players aren't playing their hearts out, bench them. I'm serious. Call up Bass or Zubov or whomever and sit any guy Hartsburg feels isn't giving his all. I don't care if that means Heatley or Spezza sitting for a game or two. We're already spinning our wheels, so another loss or two isn't going to sink us much lower.

I think that was the first bad game Spezza had, honestly. His turnover in the first game OT was a bad move on an otherwise great night, and since then he's been making good plays, dumping and chasing -- and winning the chase. Last night he dipsy-doodled before crossing the blue-line and had a blind pass (didn't result in anything, but we lost the zone). So I'll give him a Mulligan.

Fisher can sit out for a few games until he gets back into game shape. Because he isn't in it right now. How many times have you seen him go for a hit and end up on his a**?

Heatley, in my opinion, has taken on some of the bad habits Spezza had shed. He can join Fish, or alternate with him. Don't really care, but for a guy who's wearing the A I think he should be doing more.

I'd like to see some youthful enthusiasm. Bring up Zubov, Smith, Bass (of course). Bring back Lee, please. Trade Schubert. I used to love that guy but he's pouting while getting paid close to a million/year just because he cannot play full-time D? Did he not watch game tape from the pre-season? I have no problem with him playing D if it's deserved, but come on.

shabbs


Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer

504Heater wrote:It's a good take Rooney. I can't help it either, I want to hold out until 20 games in to see where we are. It was damn frustrating last night though.
Heh heh. Well, it's not like we have any control over what happens. So, we just watch and see what happens. We are at the mercy of Murray and Hartsburg... and ultimately Melnyk...

138GAME DAY: Ottawa Senators @ Toronto Maple Leafs - 7:00pm Oct. 25th, 2008 - Page 10 Empty a look back at 06-07 Sun Oct 26, 2008 4:50 pm

wprager


Administrator
Administrator

This is how the team started the 2006-07 season:

G1: 4-1 win against Toronto (Gerber)
G2: 6-0 loss to Toronto (Gerber started but pulled)
G3: 4-3 loss to Buffalo (Gerber)
G4: 1-0 loss to Calgary (Emery)
G5: 3-2 shootout win against Montreal (Emery)
G6: 2-1 loss to Colorado (Gerber)
G7: 8-1 win against New Jersey (Emery)
G8: 6-2 win against Toronto (Gerber)
G9: 7-2 win against Toronto (Emery)
G10: 2-1 loss to Boston (Gerber)
G11: 4-2 loss to Montreal (Emery)
G12: 3-2 loss to Carolina (Gerber)
G13: 4-3 OT loss to Washington (Gerber)
G14: 5-4 loss to Atlanta (Gerber)
G15: 6-3 win against Pittsburgh (Gerber)
G16: 4-3 loss to Boston (Gerber)
G17: 6-3 loss to Montreal (Gerber)

6-11 record after 17 games (plus a loser point) and that's when Emery took over.

This year we have 2 wins after 8 games (we had 4 in 06-07). We also have Auld instead of Emery. I'm a little worried but it's still too early to be worried a lot.

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator

Tukker wrote:I still think letting Ray go was a mistake. Crying we had finally developed a goalie, and then we blow it.

While I agree, you and Hemlock have to find a good family therapist for my daughters. Thank goodness the boys are outside on the trampoline, because I wouldn't put it past one of them.

Guest


Guest

wprager wrote:
Tukker wrote:I still think letting Ray go was a mistake. Crying we had finally developed a goalie, and then we blow it.

While I agree, you and Hemlock have to find a good family therapist for my daughters. Thank goodness the boys are outside on the trampoline, because I wouldn't put it past one of them.
at least mines not sexual. :lol!:

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator

Tukker wrote:
wprager wrote:
Tukker wrote:I still think letting Ray go was a mistake. Crying we had finally developed a goalie, and then we blow it.

While I agree, you and Hemlock have to find a good family therapist for my daughters. Thank goodness the boys are outside on the trampoline, because I wouldn't put it past one of them.
at least mines not sexual. :lol!:

Ugh, if you think Hemlock's would arouse anyone (male, female or animal), please keep them away from this forum.

No, seriously.

Guest


Guest

wprager wrote:
Tukker wrote:
wprager wrote:
Tukker wrote:I still think letting Ray go was a mistake. Crying we had finally developed a goalie, and then we blow it.

While I agree, you and Hemlock have to find a good family therapist for my daughters. Thank goodness the boys are outside on the trampoline, because I wouldn't put it past one of them.
at least mines not sexual. :lol!:

Ugh, if you think Hemlock's would arouse anyone (male, female or animal), please keep them away from this forum.

No, seriously.
i never said that. mine doesnt show anything inappropriate.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 10 of 10]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum