Seriously, what’s the point of drafting Tkachuk if Wilson can get suspended for a hit like that?
GM Hockey
Lagoon wrote:Seriously, what’s the point of drafting Tkachuk if Wilson can get suspended for a hit like that?
Flo The Action wrote:From what I hear the canes are willing to trade the 2nd overall.
I don’t think it’s impossible that the Sens move up two spots to grab Svechnikov. What would be the price for that. I imagine at least a 2nd round pick? But after that 2nd 1st we don’t even have a pick till the 4rth round. I guess that could change between now and then.
But probably Carolina is after a player though and not a pick. They want to get better now
tim1_2 wrote:Flo The Action wrote:From what I hear the canes are willing to trade the 2nd overall.
I don’t think it’s impossible that the Sens move up two spots to grab Svechnikov. What would be the price for that. I imagine at least a 2nd round pick? But after that 2nd 1st we don’t even have a pick till the 4rth round. I guess that could change between now and then.
But probably Carolina is after a player though and not a pick. They want to get better now
Yeah, I'm not sure just adding a 2nd rounder in would get that deal done. It's pretty rare you see any picks this high get dealt, and even more rare when it's just a "trading down" scenario. As you say, if Carolina does move down, they'll want an impact player.
DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:I'd much rather Boqvist or Bouchard if we're not getting Zadina or Svechnikov. Maybe even Whalstrom. Tkachuk is a 'safe' pick. He will be an NHLer and if he produces like his brother I'd be okay with a 50-60 point guy. But he won't be a 'star' and that's what this team needs right now. Some of our forward prospects will score in the same range. Unless you're getting a player that can score 80 points a season I think you look at D options.
Lagoon wrote:Lagoon wrote:With an April 28th date being talked about for the draft lottery, it is about time we start talking next Ottawa Senators here.
I just watched Bouchard play last night and outside the consensus top 3, picking 4-6 is going to be tough to decide.I haven’t forgot about Bouchard. Quoted above is the original post that started this thread. The D is deep at the top of this draft and nobody has even mentioned Ty Smith yet either. I just think Dahlin, Boqvist and Hughes go before Bouchard. Boqvist is doing amazing things for his age as he was almost eligible for the 2019 draft. Him and Tkachuk are the opposite there because Tkachuk was born one day later than the cutoff for the 2017 draft, making him the oldest in this draft.DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:Everyone is forgetting Bouchard who is much bigger and better defensively than both Boqvist and Hughes, and led the crappy Knights team in points.
As I have said multiple times, if the Sens can get their hands on another top-10 pick (Ceci or Hoffman trade) I certainly see them going after Bouchard if he is available.
Yup. Here’s a post of mine from Pg.9 of this thread. I’d love to be in our draft room. Tkachuk is the oldest in this draft, Boqvist is the baby. Hughes is impressing me more and more every game. Good thing I trust our drafting.tim1_2 wrote:Interesting thing about Boqvist is that he was born in August 2000, whereas Tkachuk and Zadina are 1999 birthdays...Boqvist is almost an entire year younger than Tkachuk.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum