If Murray was still GM he'd be all over Gudbranson.
He's big AND from Ottawa? Probably would trade Chabot and picks for him.
He's big AND from Ottawa? Probably would trade Chabot and picks for him.
SpezDispensed wrote:Great site with links only to the people who know what they're talking about.
Here's another one:
http://www.todaysslapshot.com/from-the-ice/friedman-wonders-about-tarasenkos-future-blues/
And instead of a knee-jerk thread about when Tarasenko will be traded, Friedman wonders if he's part of the future and if the Blues are truly 'unhappy' with his performance, is it a matter of time before he's traded.
Also on that site, there are rumblings of an early trade between Chicago and Edmonton where Edmonton would take on Bickell in exchange for Kruger, and claims they also have interest in Shaw. Chiarelli and Bowman are co-GMs (or something) for Team Canada, so they've likely been hammering this out for a while.
SpezDispensed wrote:http://www.todaysslapshot.com/from-the-ice/friedman-weighs-in-on-potential-benn-contract-extension/
Here's an interesting take on the contract extension for Benn, saying it'll be around 9 million - or 500K one way or the other, and the questions that arise about why Kopitar would cost more than a Hart Trophy nominee.
The answer:
Kopitar has won 2 Cups and Benn has won absolutely nothing, basically the same thing with Kane and Toews, although he didn't mention it. It's gonna start a premium for elite level Cup winners, where perhaps that wasn't necessarily there before. Or rather, it'll cost less to re-sign elite level players that haven't won a Cup. As it should be too. Winning a Cup is hard and what it's all about.
SpezDispensed wrote:http://www.todaysslapshot.com/ottawa-senators/pierre-dorion-has-plenty-of-work-to-do-with-senators/
Eriksson, Staal, Ladd and Backes are mentioned quickly, but nothing else.
Flo The Action wrote:Dude.spader wrote:Eklund says E Staal to Ottawa. He has it listed as a (mostly worthless) E4.
I could be convinced that he'd be a decent player on a 2nd liner's salary, but anything over about $4-4.5M and I'm going to be real unhappy.
Of course, this is Eklund, so it's almost certain that he made it up while sitting on the crapper.
If he days It then you know It Will never happen.
“I have a pretty good idea where they would like to be at, and we’ll see whether or not we can find common ground there, but we have been having ongoing discussions on that front. As I’ve always said, I really respect Loui as a player. He had a fabulous year and (we) would love to be able to retain him.”
SpezDispensed wrote:I think I recall reading he wanted 6.5 x 5 years, a long, expensive contract and the Bruins weren't into that one bit. If that's the case, that probably puts us out of it as well.
Flo The Action wrote:SpezDispensed wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Again proving that hockey insiders re actually pretty useless...
Gudbranson and a late pick to Vancouver for Jared McCann and a couple mid round picks.
McCann and a2nd4rth. Don't love this for Vancouver. ..
FYP. love It now?
Sens like Gubranson wasnt planning out in Florida. Might as well get some value. Van probably just trying to get a younger D going.
Chris Johnston ✔ @reporterchris
So it's McCann, a 2016 2nd and 2016 4th to #FlaPanthers for Gudbranson and 2016 5th. No salary retained.
wprager wrote:SpezDispensed wrote:I think I recall reading he wanted 6.5 x 5 years, a long, expensive contract and the Bruins weren't into that one bit. If that's the case, that probably puts us out of it as well.
We have no room for a $6M+ player, and I don't mean the internal budget. We have Turris/Zibanejad/Pageau/Lazar/Smith/White down the middle, so there is no room for a center at all. On the left side we have Hoffman/MacArthurz/Smith/Puempel/Dzingle. On the right we have Stone/Ryan/Neil.
While there is room on the right (even thought there's certainly a chance that Chiasson returns) it's certainly not room for "Steve Austin" (for you kids, "Steve Austin" is the original $6M man).
A trade with someone else going the other way would be needed before we bring anyone else in.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum