Spezza for sharp? I'd be so happy.
GM Hockey
NEELY wrote:Also Sandy if you don't believe most of that blame came from MacLean and other players (like MacArthur who basically called out Spezza short of mentioning his name) then I am not sure what else I can say to you.
Might be time to admit you bet on the wrong horse.
ya, sharp would be great here. doubt it happens though.SpezDispenser wrote:Or someone suggested sharp + leddy for Spezza, but clearly that's too little from us. Diddle I'd love sharp. There are those rumours he doesn't fit in there, I'd love to have him here and Chicago was a 2c away from making the final IMO.
Please.
Flo The Action wrote:ya, sharp would be great here. doubt it happens though.SpezDispenser wrote:Or someone suggested sharp + leddy for Spezza, but clearly that's too little from us. Diddle I'd love sharp. There are those rumours he doesn't fit in there, I'd love to have him here and Chicago was a 2c away from making the final IMO.
Please.
gotta love how it feels a deal will finally happen. can't wait to be rid of him, only hope the return is a little higher then what's been discussed lately on here... would like someone better then berglund.
sandysensfan wrote:
He is not a defensive gem, never will be. But a point a game player over his career and in the playoffs, it's going to be hard to replace his points. You win games by stopping pucks, but you have to put them in the other net as well. With everyone playing up a level, depending on the return for Spezza of course, it won't be as easy next season...
sandysensfan wrote:NEELY wrote:Also Sandy if you don't believe most of that blame came from MacLean and other players (like MacArthur who basically called out Spezza short of mentioning his name) then I am not sure what else I can say to you.
Might be time to admit you bet on the wrong horse.
You don't like him, I get that..
He is not a defensive gem, never will be. But a point a game player over his career and in the playoffs, it's going to be hard to replace his points. You win games by stopping pucks, but you have to put them in the other net as well. With everyone playing up a level, depending on the return for Spezza of course, it won't be as easy next season...
not that berglund is bad but i would like someone more promising back or that bring a style of play that could help us a lot in the long run. say DSPSpezDispenser wrote:Flo The Action wrote:ya, sharp would be great here. doubt it happens though.SpezDispenser wrote:Or someone suggested sharp + leddy for Spezza, but clearly that's too little from us. Diddle I'd love sharp. There are those rumours he doesn't fit in there, I'd love to have him here and Chicago was a 2c away from making the final IMO.
Please.
gotta love how it feels a deal will finally happen. can't wait to be rid of him, only hope the return is a little higher then what's been discussed lately on here... would like someone better then berglund.
Why do you say that about berglund?
Flo The Action wrote:not that berglund is bad but i would like someone more promising back or that bring a style of play that could help us a lot in the long run. say DSPSpezDispenser wrote:Flo The Action wrote:ya, sharp would be great here. doubt it happens though.SpezDispenser wrote:Or someone suggested sharp + leddy for Spezza, but clearly that's too little from us. Diddle I'd love sharp. There are those rumours he doesn't fit in there, I'd love to have him here and Chicago was a 2c away from making the final IMO.
Please.
gotta love how it feels a deal will finally happen. can't wait to be rid of him, only hope the return is a little higher then what's been discussed lately on here... would like someone better then berglund.
Why do you say that about berglund?
LeKing wrote:sandysensfan wrote:NEELY wrote:Also Sandy if you don't believe most of that blame came from MacLean and other players (like MacArthur who basically called out Spezza short of mentioning his name) then I am not sure what else I can say to you.
Might be time to admit you bet on the wrong horse.
You don't like him, I get that..
He is not a defensive gem, never will be. But a point a game player over his career and in the playoffs, it's going to be hard to replace his points. You win games by stopping pucks, but you have to put them in the other net as well. With everyone playing up a level, depending on the return for Spezza of course, it won't be as easy next season...
And what has Spezza done in the past 5 years in the playoffs that helped the Sens win games? Last year without Spezza was the best results this team had in the playoffs. What do you say about that?
Playing a TEAM game is more important than putting or giving up goals. Leadership, hard work, defensive commitment, smart plays at the the right time etc. In fact he is only good at 1 thing and no Stanley cup winning team will ever have a player like him on it.
NEELY wrote:
Murray going out and getting a ton of pieces or the best possible player IMO is a mistake... you are building a team and he needs the right piece coming back and IMO that's a power forward. DPS, Ritchie (from Dallas), Stewart from Buffalo (wouldn't be a Spezza trade), those are the guys that if they break out or find consistency you will never find in a trade again short of shipping off another star. Sens need a legit PF in the worst way.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum