All Things Binghamton Senators!

Saw a tweet where they said the score was 4-0 after two but the scary stat was shots on goal being something like 29-5. Bad enough to give up nearly 30 shots in 40 minutes but to only managed 5 yourself?

I think the Bsens wound up with 6 total shots. The other goalie got a 6 save shutout.

tim1_2 wrote:I think the Bsens wound up with 6 total shots. The other goalie got a 6 save shutout.

Fire Richardson!

Thats insane. Wtf is going on in Bingo. Nick Paul having a hard time adjusting to the pros.

Not puting the blame solely on nick but this is why i always keep my expectations at a low until you see some of these prospects in the AHL

It's a crappy team though, so hopefully he can get it going when they start putting it together.

Well its like all young guys its usually a jump to get used to the pro game. Very few can make the transition easily. Thats why i had doubts actually ranking him that high on our prospects list. Still see him as a 3rd liner.

It's a crappy team, sure, but what worries me is that our top prospect (at pro level), Paul, is not even playing on the top line. Harpur and Claesson -- two guys I had high hopes for -- are not the top pairing. Robinson -- who was one of the last cuts at last year's camp -- is on the fourth line. I'm not worried so much about O'Connor because we won't need him to be at his best for 2-3 years. He's got time. It's just that all the players we have been talking about are not even playing top line/pairing minutes and are not leading that team. Given how badly the team is doing, maybe it's a good thing they are not *leading*, but on the other hand the fact that they are not leading is telling, too.

When MacArthur is back they'll send Greening back; maybe they should send Lazar, instead, let him lead the team back out of the basement.

wprager wrote:It's a crappy team, sure, but what worries me is that our top prospect (at pro level), Paul, is not even playing on the top line.  Harpur and Claesson -- two guys I had high hopes for -- are not the top pairing.  Robinson -- who was one of the last cuts at last year's camp -- is on the fourth line.  I'm not worried so much about O'Connor because we won't need him to be at his best for 2-3 years.  He's got time.  It's just that all the players we have been talking about are not even playing top line/pairing minutes and are not leading that team.  Given how badly the team is doing, maybe it's a good thing they are not *leading*, but on the other hand the fact that they are not leading is telling, too.

When MacArthur is back they'll send Greening back; maybe they should send Lazar, instead, let him lead the team back out of the basement.

I agree, sending lazar would help both lazar and the bingo team.

Flo The Action wrote:

wprager wrote:It's a crappy team, sure, but what worries me is that our top prospect (at pro level), Paul, is not even playing on the top line.  Harpur and Claesson -- two guys I had high hopes for -- are not the top pairing.  Robinson -- who was one of the last cuts at last year's camp -- is on the fourth line.  I'm not worried so much about O'Connor because we won't need him to be at his best for 2-3 years.  He's got time.  It's just that all the players we have been talking about are not even playing top line/pairing minutes and are not leading that team.  Given how badly the team is doing, maybe it's a good thing they are not *leading*, but on the other hand the fact that they are not leading is telling, too.

When MacArthur is back they'll send Greening back; maybe they should send Lazar, instead, let him lead the team back out of the basement.

I agree, sending lazar would help both lazar and the bingo team.

But hurt the Ottawa team.

Greenham gives up 5 on 17 before being replaced by O'Connor. Boy, they suck, don't they. Now 6-2, so O'Connor is actually "winning" 2-1.

EDIT: 6-3 now.

Lol it was 6-0 and it ended 6-5. Two great teams slapping it out there.

SpezDispensed wrote:Lol it was 6-0 and it ended 6-5.  Two great teams slapping it out there.

Might want to look up "great" in the dictionary.

wprager wrote:

SpezDispensed wrote:Lol it was 6-0 and it ended 6-5.  Two great teams slapping it out there.

Might want to look up "great" in the dictionary.

SpezD has his own dictionary. How many times has he said Lazar was "great?"

That's right.

I tried using google search with the little-known "AROUND" operator (search for "lazar AROUND(2) great site:gmhockey.com") but we have that outdated poll on the left-side of every page that includes "Lazar" and so, short version: I don't know.

wprager wrote:

SpezDispensed wrote:Lol it was 6-0 and it ended 6-5.  Two great teams slapping it out there.

Might want to look up "great" in the dictionary.

Might want to fine tune your sarcasm detector.

SpezDispensed wrote:

wprager wrote:

SpezDispensed wrote:Lol it was 6-0 and it ended 6-5.  Two great teams slapping it out there.

Might want to look up "great" in the dictionary.

Might want to fine tune your sarcasm detector.

Done!

For those that haven't seen it yet, here's a little evaluation on bingo.

http://eyeonthesens.com