If they didn't match it was the end of their franchise. Hopefully this goes a long way in building that team as a legit hockey city. Respect was earned today.
GM Hockey
NEELY wrote:If they didn't match it was the end of their franchise. Hopefully this goes a long way in building that team as a legit hockey city. Respect was earned today.
So, if there is a year-long lockout, the Preds still have to pay the bonuses right? $13M later this year, and another $13M on July 1st next year.Flo The Action wrote:I thought the bonuses would prevent Nashville from matching. Happy they did. Now this will be interesting to see how enthusiastic Weber is about being a Preds for life.
spader wrote:Riprock wrote:Nashville should sign Voracek to an offer sheet now.
I'm thinking that might be doing Philly a favour. They have a bit of a logjam in the top 6 right now with Briere, Giroux, Hartnell, Schenn, Simmonds, Couturier, Read, and Voracek. Losing Voracek for a 1st and a 3rd wouldn't be terrible. They can possibly do better than that on the trade front, but I don't know that they'd match at this point.
Riprock wrote:No offence, but if losing the team meant Canada got an 8th team, then I wouldn't care if Nashville lost their team.
Riprock wrote:That will never happen. It would have happened years ago. Don't get me started on Arizona, no idea how they still have a team (despite not actually owning one).
Riprock wrote:Even though they matched, still could have ripple effects. Ticket prices could go up for owner to recoup costs, thus attendance and revenue falls.
Big Ev wrote:Diddle yeah says Poile:
Yeah, I believe that is a condition of an offer sheet - they can't be part of the offer sheet. Word was that if the Preds did not match, Philly would put one in place after via an amendment.hemlock wrote:Hmm, according to capgeek, this Weber contract does not include a NMC, or at least it's unknown at this point. How fantastic for the Preds if not.
Riprock wrote:spader wrote:Riprock wrote:Nashville should sign Voracek to an offer sheet now.
I'm thinking that might be doing Philly a favour. They have a bit of a logjam in the top 6 right now with Briere, Giroux, Hartnell, Schenn, Simmonds, Couturier, Read, and Voracek. Losing Voracek for a 1st and a 3rd wouldn't be terrible. They can possibly do better than that on the trade front, but I don't know that they'd match at this point.
If this is still the correct compensation, then I'd offer $3.134M max, which would only cost a 2nd round pick, for a 45-50 point forward. If Philly matches, so be it. Then they are stuck with a $3M+ bottom 6 forward they can't trade for at least one year, and prevents them from making other moves (i.e. Doan, a defenceman). Also takes away a bargaining chip in any possible trade offers to acquire a defenceman now that they lost out on Weber.
$1,034,249 annual cap hit or less: No compensation
$1,034,249 — $1,567,043: Third-round pick
$1,567,043 — $3,134,088: Second-round pick
$3,134,088 — $4,701,131: First and third-round pick
$4,701,131 — $6,268,175: First, second and third-round pick
$6,268,175 — $7,835,219: Two first-round picks, a second and third
$7,835,219 and higher: Four first-round picks
GM Hockey » The other NHL teams » General Hockey talk » WEBER SIGNS 14 YEAR OFFER SHEET WITH FLYERS!
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|