To be given the chance to do that is what I meant. Itsvmy opinion that he will.
GM Hockey
stempniaksen wrote:Hypothetically, how do people feel about our lineup if Latendresse and Regin both miss significant time this season. I know we have a ton on young talent, but both these guys getting hurt might mean 3-4 guys getting tossed into the fire.
SpezDispenser wrote:
My personal opinion is that Greening moves up and takes a top six role because we know he can fill it from last year.
Hoags wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:
My personal opinion is that Greening moves up and takes a top six role because we know he can fill it from last year.
Latendresse will get it to start (just like Filatov did). Whether he keeps it is another story.
SpezDispenser wrote:
In that hypothetical Latendresse and Regin are both hurt.
Big Ev wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:wprager wrote:You know how we are all penciling Latendresse in on the 1st or 2nd line? Simpson was on the morning show today or yesterday and it was a very interesting call. He talked about all the recent signings/trades. His take on Latendresse was that he'll get a try out on the third line, and if he works out, great. He certainly has the ceiling to play top six but at this point it's not what Murray/Maclean will be planning.
Very sobering interview. He didn't come out and say it but I figure he was thinking Regin -- until there is another move, that is.
I have to say that makes zero sense. Everyone here knows I love Regin, but Latendresse was signed to play in our top 6 and score 25 goals, there can be no mistake there in my mind.
Regin will have to work - and work hard to get back into that top six - and even then, to do it he'll have to either usurp Silfverberg or move up due to injury. Unless Lat comes in out of shape, then he's Cussed here.
He was signed because he MIGHT BE ABLE TO do that. Nobody who is guaranteed to do that signs for 1 year at $1 million...
rooneypoo wrote:Huh. CapGeek has Latendresse listed as an RFA at the end of this contract, too, but I see he has 6 NHL seasons accrued already, with this upcoming year being his 7th. Think they have that one wrong -- or, at least, I don't see how it cold be right.
NEELY wrote:Noesen being the super dark horse.
rooneypoo wrote:Huh. CapGeek has Latendresse listed as an RFA at the end of this contract, too, but I see he has 6 NHL seasons accrued already, with this upcoming year being his 7th. Think they have that one wrong -- or, at least, I don't see how it cold be right.
dennycrane wrote:rooneypoo wrote:Huh. CapGeek has Latendresse listed as an RFA at the end of this contract, too, but I see he has 6 NHL seasons accrued already, with this upcoming year being his 7th. Think they have that one wrong -- or, at least, I don't see how it cold be right.
Latendresse was not qualified by the Wild.
SpezDispenser wrote:dennycrane wrote:rooneypoo wrote:Huh. CapGeek has Latendresse listed as an RFA at the end of this contract, too, but I see he has 6 NHL seasons accrued already, with this upcoming year being his 7th. Think they have that one wrong -- or, at least, I don't see how it cold be right.
Latendresse was not qualified by the Wild.
Does that make him an RFA at the end?
SpezDispenser wrote:Games played?
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum