Crazy Dung.
GM Hockey
Riprock wrote:Pittsburgh has a right to be upset with that first goal being allowed. Clearly offside. Poor non-call.
Last edited by Big Ev on Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:55 pm; edited 1 time in total
Riprock wrote:There are so many factors at play though. Sure, they still had a 2 goal lead, but what effects did that goal have? What would have happened if they made they right call? So many if's. Point is - it was a blown call, and without it, who knows how the game plays out.
Big Ev wrote:dirty female parental unit diddler Weber
forgot the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV4EwedHC9I&feature=youtu.be
Big Ev wrote:dirty female parental unit diddler Weber
forgot the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV4EwedHC9I&feature=youtu.be
Riprock wrote:I heard that Vancouver's goal should have been called off because Kesler interfered with Quick?
also, SD, you know you wouldn't be taking this offside so lightly if the Rangers scored on a missed offside against the sens tomorrow night
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|