By the by, is Ehrhoff for two pieces of Dung, officially the worst trade of the year now, or do we still have to wait it out?
GM Hockey
PKC wrote:stempniaksen wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:Hodgson for Kaberle I something I can actually believe.
I think Vancouver makes out like bandits there to be honest.
Vancouver is going to pick up another defenseman? Don't they have like 100 already?
SeawaySensFan wrote:The latest from the GMsOffice:
Look for the Bruins to add a d-man when the freeze lifts. No agreement on the deal yet, though. (via @DarrenDreger)
about 20 hours ago from web Dallas is defanetely listening to calls about Richards...could be a suprise deadline deal..looking into interested calling
http://twitter.com/GMsOffice
PKC wrote:Not a lot of teams that are going to be able to take on Richards' ginormous contract. Maybe the Habs have given up on getting Lecavalier and are gonna go for the next best thing?
PKC wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:The latest from the GMsOffice:
Look for the Bruins to add a d-man when the freeze lifts. No agreement on the deal yet, though. (via @DarrenDreger)
about 20 hours ago from web Dallas is defanetely listening to calls about Richards...could be a suprise deadline deal..looking into interested calling
http://twitter.com/GMsOffice
Not a lot of teams that are going to be able to take on Richards' ginormous contract. Maybe the Habs have given up on getting Lecavalier and are gonna go for the next best thing?
PKC wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:The latest from the GMsOffice:
Look for the Bruins to add a d-man when the freeze lifts. No agreement on the deal yet, though. (via @DarrenDreger)
about 20 hours ago from web Dallas is defanetely listening to calls about Richards...could be a suprise deadline deal..looking into interested calling
http://twitter.com/GMsOffice
Not a lot of teams that are going to be able to take on Richards' ginormous contract. Maybe the Habs have given up on getting Lecavalier and are gonna go for the next best thing?
TheAvatar wrote:You have my attention; How? Really how could we take on Richards?. You have a taker for Spezza?
TheAvatar wrote:You have my attention; How? Really how could we take on Richards?. You have a taker for Spezza?
SpezDispenser wrote:TheAvatar wrote:You have my attention; How? Really how could we take on Richards?. You have a taker for Spezza?
Loaded question to ask SSF, but it's Kelly's contract out that would almost perfectly equal Richards coming in.
stempniaksen wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:TheAvatar wrote:You have my attention; How? Really how could we take on Richards?. You have a taker for Spezza?
Loaded question to ask SSF, but it's Kelly's contract out that would almost perfectly equal Richards coming in.
Only for this season though. Next year we'd be screwed cap wise.
SpezDispenser wrote:TheAvatar wrote:You have my attention; How? Really how could we take on Richards?. You have a taker for Spezza?
Loaded question to ask SSF, but it's Kelly's contract out that would almost perfectly equal Richards coming in.
SpezDispenser wrote:stempniaksen wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:TheAvatar wrote:You have my attention; How? Really how could we take on Richards?. You have a taker for Spezza?
Loaded question to ask SSF, but it's Kelly's contract out that would almost perfectly equal Richards coming in.
Only for this season though. Next year we'd be screwed cap wise.
I challenge that it could be made to work, it might not be the smartest way of going about things, but I would have to look at numbers.
stempniaksen wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:stempniaksen wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:TheAvatar wrote:You have my attention; How? Really how could we take on Richards?. You have a taker for Spezza?
Loaded question to ask SSF, but it's Kelly's contract out that would almost perfectly equal Richards coming in.
Only for this season though. Next year we'd be screwed cap wise.
I challenge that it could be made to work, it might not be the smartest way of going about things, but I would have to look at numbers.
Of course it could work, but it would mean trading away important members of our team. Something based around Kovalev + Fisher or Kovalev + Kelly or Kelly + Fisher would work cap wise. Still and idiotic trade to make for a glorified 2nd line center.
strachattack wrote:stempniaksen wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:stempniaksen wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:TheAvatar wrote:You have my attention; How? Really how could we take on Richards?. You have a taker for Spezza?
Loaded question to ask SSF, but it's Kelly's contract out that would almost perfectly equal Richards coming in.
Only for this season though. Next year we'd be screwed cap wise.
I challenge that it could be made to work, it might not be the smartest way of going about things, but I would have to look at numbers.
Of course it could work, but it would mean trading away important members of our team. Something based around Kovalev + Fisher or Kovalev + Kelly or Kelly + Fisher would work cap wise. Still and idiotic trade to make for a glorified 2nd line center.
I would gladly take their glorified 2nd line centre over our current glorified second line centre.
SeawaySensFan wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:TheAvatar wrote:You have my attention; How? Really how could we take on Richards?. You have a taker for Spezza?
Loaded question to ask SSF, but it's Kelly's contract out that would almost perfectly equal Richards coming in.
We need Kelly. He kills penalties. No one else can do that.
SpezDispenser wrote:PKC wrote:Not a lot of teams that are going to be able to take on Richards' ginormous contract. Maybe the Habs have given up on getting Lecavalier and are gonna go for the next best thing?
Boy, I hope not. Richards would be their best forward in the last decade.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum