GM Hockey
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
GM Hockey

You are not connected. Please login or register

GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010

+22
TeamRenzo
beerandsens
AlfieisGod11
Tuk Tuk
Bramlet07
sens4win
asq2
rooneypoo
PTFlea
Cap'n Clutch
pegsensfan
SensHulk
garblar
LeCaptain
Hobiesens
caissie_1
benIII24III
Hoags
PKC
SeawaySensFan
Riprock
wprager
26 posters

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 12 ... 20, 21, 22, 23  Next

Montreal @ Ottawa - Jan. 30, 2010

GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_lcap213%GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_rcap2 13% [ 3 ]
GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_lcap238%GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_rcap2 38% [ 9 ]
GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_lcap20%GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_rcap2 0% [ 0 ]
GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_lcap24%GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_rcap2 4% [ 1 ]
GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_lcap28%GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_rcap2 8% [ 2 ]
GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_lcap24%GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_rcap2 4% [ 1 ]
GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_lcap233%GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 Vote_rcap2 33% [ 8 ]
Total Votes : 24

Poll closed

Go down  Message [Page 21 of 23]

PKC


All-Star
All-Star

MurderOnIce wrote:The thing is you pay for hard work and pay a huge premium for talent. Defence is focus and hard work. Offense is talent, which is not teachable. The fact we are paying big money to Spezza for his talent is in line with what the rest of the leagues salary structure and a sign of what is valued the most. Theory is, it is easier to get players to work hard and focus. It is not easy to teach a hard working player to have offensive creativity.

Point in case: Chris Kelly.

PKC


All-Star
All-Star

Here's a list of all the players who get paid in the Jason Spezza range ($6.5-7.5 million):

Scott Niedermayer - 6.75 (5G, 25 A, -17) 55 GP
Zdeno Chara - 7.5 (4G, 25 A, +5) 53 GP
Thomas Vanek - 7.18 (16G, 17 A, +1) 48 GP
Jarome Iginla - 7 (24G, 27 A, +3) 55 GP
Jay Bouwmeester - 6.68 (2G, 18 A, +11) 55 GP
Dion Phaneuf - 6.5 (10G, 12 A, +3) 55 GP
Brian Campbell - 7.14 (6G, 28 A, +16) 55 GP
Paul Stastny - 6.6 (11G, 37 A, +11) 53 GP
Brad Richards - 7.8 (15G, 44 A, -11) 52 GP
Pavel Datsyuk - 6.7 (14G, 29 A, +13) 52 GP
Nicklas Lidstrom - 7.45 (6G, 26 A, +20) 54 GP
Anze Kopitar - 6.8 (23G, 32 A, +7) 54 GP
Scott Gomez - 7.4 (7G, 28 A, -1) 52 GP
Marian Gaborik - 7.5 (30G, 32 A, +7) 53 GP
Chris Drury - 7.05 (8G, 11 A, -11) 50 GP
Wade Redden - 6.5 (1G, 7 A, even) 48 GP
Henrik Lundqvist - 6.875 (22-19-6, 2.40 GAA, .920 sv%) 48 GP
Jason Spezza - 7 (9G, 14 A, -1) 34 GP
Daniel Briere - 6.5 (18G, 16 A, -1) 46 GP
Ed Jovanovski - 6.5 (9G, 18 A, -3) 41 GP
Dany Heatley - 7.5 (30G, 29 A, +15) 55 GP
Joe Thornton - 7.2 (13G, 55 A, +16) 55 GP
Dan Boyle - 6.67 (10G, 33 A, +6) 51 GP
Roberto Luongo - 6.75 (29-14-2, .920 sv%, 2.31 GAA) 47 GP

wprager


Administrator
Administrator

Can someone do a better job than this?

GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 93617_311

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator

marakh wrote:Let's not forget Varlamov. If he comes back soon, that 16-1 record as of now won't be easy to ignore.

Is Varlamov a rookie after playing 19 games last season? Or don't playoff games count toward rookie eligibility?


_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox

wprager

wprager
Administrator
Administrator

So, with Green suspended for 3 games, does that slow the Caps down?


_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox

PKC

PKC
All-Star
All-Star

wprager wrote:
marakh wrote:Let's not forget Varlamov. If he comes back soon, that 16-1 record as of now won't be easy to ignore.

Is Varlamov a rookie after playing 19 games last season? Or don't playoff games count toward rookie eligibility?

Playoff games don't count.

Guest


Guest

rooneypoo wrote:
hemlock wrote:
TeamRenzo wrote:
rooneypoo wrote:
Dash wrote:N4L GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 233319

Neely's whole point is that scoring isn't everything, and that people who think Spezza is "elite" and "essential to this team" spend too much time reading stats and not enough time watching games.

Try again. GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 54934

Really? So why is he fast to point out that Kelly has more goals than Spezza?

He very rarely points out the good things Spezza does in a game, but jumps all over his mistakes. He has personal issues with Spezza I am sure of it.

Try again GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 54934

There's some truth to it. I pointed out to him the other day during a game, that he had Spezza under a microscope like noone else. Sure, Spezza is the highest paid player, but the amount of scrutiny he receives from N4L is way over the top. And N4L practically agreed.

No matter what though, despite winning a few converts over like the good Dr., he will never convince most people here that Spezza is as bad as he says he is, because, like you said, it almost seems personal.

The point is not that Spezza is a bad player. It's that he's not a $7 mil, highest-paid-player-on-your-team, contributing-in-all-situations, heir-to-Alfie kind of guy. There's a huge difference between not being bad and being great for your team -- therein lies the dilemma with Spezza.

Don't let 4 decent games and a 6-game goalscoring streak wipe out from your memories the years and years of bad turnovers and lazy, half-assed, poor-hearted play. Keep it all in mind.

Spezza has until this June to prove his worth to the Sens organization. Ball's in his court.

Ive NEVER said Spezza is "a bad player". I say he isnt a 7 million dollar player, a true first line center, or a player a team can be built around. Do I expect a lot from the highest paid plakyer on the team? Yeah, I do. I expect him to make others around him better, lead, do what ever it takes to work, Spezza does none of those.

It shouldnt take him getting hurt or injured for the team to turn things around going into the playoffs (like in 2007) then him being forced to buy into what the team is selling.

Right now he does 100 things right, then 100 things wrong. Has to stop.

PKC

PKC
All-Star
All-Star

N4L wrote:
rooneypoo wrote:
hemlock wrote:
TeamRenzo wrote:
rooneypoo wrote:
Dash wrote:N4L GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 233319

Neely's whole point is that scoring isn't everything, and that people who think Spezza is "elite" and "essential to this team" spend too much time reading stats and not enough time watching games.

Try again. GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 54934

Really? So why is he fast to point out that Kelly has more goals than Spezza?

He very rarely points out the good things Spezza does in a game, but jumps all over his mistakes. He has personal issues with Spezza I am sure of it.

Try again GAME DAY: Montreal Canadiens @ Ottawa Senators - 2:00pm ET - Sat. Jan. 30. 2010 - Page 21 54934

There's some truth to it. I pointed out to him the other day during a game, that he had Spezza under a microscope like noone else. Sure, Spezza is the highest paid player, but the amount of scrutiny he receives from N4L is way over the top. And N4L practically agreed.

No matter what though, despite winning a few converts over like the good Dr., he will never convince most people here that Spezza is as bad as he says he is, because, like you said, it almost seems personal.

The point is not that Spezza is a bad player. It's that he's not a $7 mil, highest-paid-player-on-your-team, contributing-in-all-situations, heir-to-Alfie kind of guy. There's a huge difference between not being bad and being great for your team -- therein lies the dilemma with Spezza.

Don't let 4 decent games and a 6-game goalscoring streak wipe out from your memories the years and years of bad turnovers and lazy, half-assed, poor-hearted play. Keep it all in mind.

Spezza has until this June to prove his worth to the Sens organization. Ball's in his court.

Ive NEVER said Spezza is "a bad player". I say he isnt a 7 million dollar player, a true first line center, or a player a team can be built around. Do I expect a lot from the highest paid plakyer on the team? Yeah, I do. I expect him to make others around him better, lead, do what ever it takes to work, Spezza does none of those.

It shouldnt take him getting hurt or injured for the team to turn things around going into the playoffs (like in 2007) then him being forced to buy into what the team is selling.

Right now he does 100 things right, then 100 things wrong. Has to stop.

He scored a goal yesterday, and almost had another one on what should have certainly been called a penalty shot. I for one think Spezza's been fantastic since he came back from his injury. He just looks like he cares out there.

That end to end rush in OT is the kind of rush very few players in the league can pull off. He basically skated directly at 3 habs with 1 hanging off of him from behind and then went straight through them.

I just don't know what more you guys want the guy to do. He's gonna have to average 15 points a game for some of you to get off his back.

rooneypoo

rooneypoo
All-Star
All-Star

PKC wrote:Here's a list of all the players who get paid in the Jason Spezza range ($6.5-7.5 million):

Scott Niedermayer - 6.75 (5G, 25 A, -17) 55 GP
Zdeno Chara - 7.5 (4G, 25 A, +5) 53 GP
Thomas Vanek - 7.18 (16G, 17 A, +1) 48 GP
Jarome Iginla - 7 (24G, 27 A, +3) 55 GP
Jay Bouwmeester - 6.68 (2G, 18 A, +11) 55 GP
Dion Phaneuf - 6.5 (10G, 12 A, +3) 55 GP
Brian Campbell - 7.14 (6G, 28 A, +16) 55 GP
Paul Stastny - 6.6 (11G, 37 A, +11) 53 GP
Brad Richards - 7.8 (15G, 44 A, -11) 52 GP
Pavel Datsyuk - 6.7 (14G, 29 A, +13) 52 GP
Nicklas Lidstrom - 7.45 (6G, 26 A, +20) 54 GP
Anze Kopitar - 6.8 (23G, 32 A, +7) 54 GP
Scott Gomez - 7.4 (7G, 28 A, -1) 52 GP
Marian Gaborik - 7.5 (30G, 32 A, +7) 53 GP
Chris Drury - 7.05 (8G, 11 A, -11) 50 GP
Wade Redden - 6.5 (1G, 7 A, even) 48 GP
Henrik Lundqvist - 6.875 (22-19-6, 2.40 GAA, .920 sv%) 48 GP
Jason Spezza - 7 (9G, 14 A, -1) 34 GP
Daniel Briere - 6.5 (18G, 16 A, -1) 46 GP
Ed Jovanovski - 6.5 (9G, 18 A, -3) 41 GP
Dany Heatley - 7.5 (30G, 29 A, +15) 55 GP
Joe Thornton - 7.2 (13G, 55 A, +16) 55 GP
Dan Boyle - 6.67 (10G, 33 A, +6) 51 GP
Roberto Luongo - 6.75 (29-14-2, .920 sv%, 2.31 GAA) 47 GP

Pull out the forwards from that group, and eliminate all Sather-orchestrated contracts because we all know that there's only one senile GM in the league who would offer them, and your list looks like this:

Vanek
Iginla
Stastny
B. Richards
Datsyuk
Kopitar
Briere
Heatley
Thornton

Any GM would trade Spezza for one of Iginla, Datsyuk, Thornton, and Heatley. No questions asked. Stastny and Kopitar are younger than Spezza and have similar upside; Stastny is probably already the better player, all around, and Kopitar isn't far behind.

B. Richards was signed by a $-happy team in the euphoria following a Cup and the Conn Smyth. We can all agree he's overpaid. Even still, he's producing like a top line centre (59 points in 52 GP), and he contributes in all roles (PP, PK, etc.) -- his +/- (-11) has more to do with his team, and its shoddy goaltending, than anything else.

That leaves Vanek and Briere -- two guys who had career years (43G, 84P; 32 G, 95P). Neither have been very healthy since, but for the most part, they have put up very similar numbers as Spezza -- that is, about a .7 or .8 point per game pace.

So what do we conclude from all this? That, given his production and overall team contributions, Spezza's contract is about on part with Vanek's and Briere's -- one more dubious distinction to add to the list of a player just about everyone here agrees isn't "elite," doesn't play in all situations, isn't a key "cog" in the team, and isn't going to be Alfie's replacement.

What else do I have to do to convince you that Spezza's continued presence on this team poses a long-term threat to our team's cap situation? We can get what Spezza provides us on far less crippling terms -- few dollars, fewer years, and certainly no NMCs that could come back to cripple us, Heatley-style.

Guest


Guest

He looks better then when he left, 100%. He still makes rookie mistakes which HAS to stop. No one is trashing Spezza right now, we are stating what is happening on the ice. People just look at points and output and think that's all there is too it.

Spezza is making 7 million a year, like it or not, that is an important factor. If he was making 4.5-5.5, you wouldnt hear a lot of people sya anything. That kind of cash the player has to be your hardest worker, usually most productive (in some aspect), and a leader. It's not like he was a UFA signing that deal, he was a draft pick that has grown up in the organization, The Sens fave him what he wanted. He has yet to earn his pay check.

Again, I ask, is this team a contender with Spezza? No, they are not a true conteder. Are they a playoff team without him? Yes, they are.

rooneypoo

rooneypoo
All-Star
All-Star

PKC wrote:

He scored a goal yesterday, and almost had another one on what should have certainly been called a penalty shot. I for one think Spezza's been fantastic since he came back from his injury. He just looks like he cares out there.

That end to end rush in OT is the kind of rush very few players in the league can pull off. He basically skated directly at 3 habs with 1 hanging off of him from behind and then went straight through them.

I just don't know what more you guys want the guy to do. He's gonna have to average 15 points a game for some of you to get off his back.

Honestly, I'd settle for what he's done over the last for games, plus just a tad more consistency when he's handling the puck (which has been better this year all around). He's been shooting more and driving to the net more, both of which are things he absolutely needs to keep doing.

We're not asking for the moon. We're asking for a $7mil, 1st liner to play like one -- with consistency, game in and game out. Don't like this four-game streak wipe out years of inconsistency and turnovers, etc., including a very poor 1st half to start this year.

Guest


Guest

rooneypoo wrote:
PKC wrote:

He scored a goal yesterday, and almost had another one on what should have certainly been called a penalty shot. I for one think Spezza's been fantastic since he came back from his injury. He just looks like he cares out there.

That end to end rush in OT is the kind of rush very few players in the league can pull off. He basically skated directly at 3 habs with 1 hanging off of him from behind and then went straight through them.

I just don't know what more you guys want the guy to do. He's gonna have to average 15 points a game for some of you to get off his back.

Honestly, I'd settle for what he's done over the last for games, plus just a tad more consistency when he's handling the puck (which has been better this year all around). He's been shooting more and driving to the net more, both of which are things he absolutely needs to keep doing.

We're not asking for the moon. We're asking for a $7mil, 1st liner to play like one -- with consistency, game in and game out. Don't like this four-game streak wipe out years of inconsistency and turnovers, etc., including a very poor 1st half to start this year.

Right there, that's why I havnt really said a whole bunch about him but this thread was going before I said a word. People bring up Spezza's short comings and look at the overall picture of The Sens and the game being played and people act like he is being bashed for no reason.

rooneypoo

rooneypoo
All-Star
All-Star

N4L wrote:He looks better then when he left, 100%. He still makes rookie mistakes which HAS to stop. No one is trashing Spezza right now, we are stating what is happening on the ice. People just look at points and output and think that's all there is too it.

Spezza is making 7 million a year, like it or not, that is an important factor. If he was making 4.5-5.5, you wouldnt hear a lot of people sya anything. That kind of cash the player has to be your hardest worker, usually most productive (in some aspect), and a leader. It's not like he was a UFA signing that deal, he was a draft pick that has grown up in the organization, The Sens fave him what he wanted. He has yet to earn his pay check.

Again, I ask, is this team a contender with Spezza? No, they are not a true conteder. Are they a playoff team without him? Yes, they are.

That's the thing you've said recently that sticks with me the most. If Spezza were still 21 or 22, it'd be a different story. But he turns 27 this year. 27. Why is it that he still hasn't turned the corner? Why does he still do a lot of the things he did as a rookie? And why can't be a consistent player? Most guys learn after a series of hot streaks / cold streaks, followed by benchings, and develop some consistency. We're 6 years+ with Spezza now, and while I wouldn't argue that he's regressed, we've only seen baby steps at best.

Flo The Action

Flo The Action
Franchise Player
Franchise Player

yawn.... :blah:
i still think that spezza's play started going down this season when he came back early from injury (around the 15 game mark if i remember correctly) forcing him to play injured. we all liked how he played at the biggening and now. sure he makes 7 mill. sure he hasn't the track record to show he deserves it.
will he start earning it now? maybe
is it detrimental to this team to get rid of him? i don't think so.
could this be a savard like player?(for years having a bad rep and now showing that he was worth it). quite possibly.

not saying he's not gonna go back to his old ways. i think it's 50/50.
but if he is gonna play like he is now and we let him go, we are fool.

PKC

PKC
All-Star
All-Star

N4L wrote:
rooneypoo wrote:
PKC wrote:

He scored a goal yesterday, and almost had another one on what should have certainly been called a penalty shot. I for one think Spezza's been fantastic since he came back from his injury. He just looks like he cares out there.

That end to end rush in OT is the kind of rush very few players in the league can pull off. He basically skated directly at 3 habs with 1 hanging off of him from behind and then went straight through them.

I just don't know what more you guys want the guy to do. He's gonna have to average 15 points a game for some of you to get off his back.

Honestly, I'd settle for what he's done over the last for games, plus just a tad more consistency when he's handling the puck (which has been better this year all around). He's been shooting more and driving to the net more, both of which are things he absolutely needs to keep doing.

We're not asking for the moon. We're asking for a $7mil, 1st liner to play like one -- with consistency, game in and game out. Don't like this four-game streak wipe out years of inconsistency and turnovers, etc., including a very poor 1st half to start this year.

Right there, that's why I havnt really said a whole bunch about him but this thread was going before I said a word. People bring up Spezza's short comings and look at the overall picture of The Sens and the game being played and people act like he is being bashed for no reason.

I agree with you guys on that front, he does need to shoot more and drive the net more, but you also have to take into consideration his style of play. He's not a power forward as much as some of you want him to be, he's a play maker. It's just now he's realizing he probably has the best shot on this team and is considerably better than his linemates' (with the exception of Alfredsson).

But the guy is a passer, first and foremost. He's played that way since he was six years old. And people on here just expect that to change. I don't think there's been anything wrong with his game lately and I don't see any reason for his play to regress again like it did earlier this year.

Guest


Guest

Flo The Action wrote:yawn.... :blah:
i still think that spezza's play started going down this season when he came back early from injury (around the 15 game mark if i remember correctly) forcing him to play injured. we all liked how he played at the biggening and now. sure he makes 7 mill. sure he hasn't the track record to show he deserves it.
will he start earning it now? maybe
is it detrimental to this team to get rid of him? i don't think so.
could this be a savard like player?(for years having a bad rep and now showing that he was worth it). quite possibly.

not saying he's not gonna go back to his old ways. i think it's 50/50.
but if he is gonna play like he is now and we let him go, we are fool.

See, this is somewhat reasonable. That's why in terms of trading the guy or not, I dont have an opinion because I trust Murray. What he has done with this team along with Clouston after what Muckler did to this team farm system and the spot Heatley left them in is amazing.

Spezza will never be the leader of The Sens, but to actually help this team he has to be a guy that can be counted on in all situations. Like I said before, that Boston game where he was on in the last min of play, flipped the puck out of the zone to avoid some serious pressure from The Bruins was just about the smartest play I have ever seen Spezza make, that could have saved the game for The Sens. Who cares if he scored a goal that game, fact is when it mattered he was able to do the right thing and contribute to the win besides putting up a point or two.

Right now, even yesterday, you saw a lot of good, but as much good as you saw, there was an equal amount of bad. One that sticks out was trying to beat a D man at his own blueline with some fancy crap that and he turned it right over, thats cant happen. If that's the playoffs and Gonchar he is the guy who gives it up to, with Malkin and Crosby down low in the zone, it's in the net. If that happend in an OT game, Spezza would be shipped out of town right when the game finished. Those things will cost him and The Sens.

Offensivly, this is as good as I have seen him in a while and he's getting into dirty area's. He has changed his game a bit and he had to because what he was doing before was not working.

Guest


Guest

PKC wrote:
N4L wrote:
rooneypoo wrote:
PKC wrote:

He scored a goal yesterday, and almost had another one on what should have certainly been called a penalty shot. I for one think Spezza's been fantastic since he came back from his injury. He just looks like he cares out there.

That end to end rush in OT is the kind of rush very few players in the league can pull off. He basically skated directly at 3 habs with 1 hanging off of him from behind and then went straight through them.

I just don't know what more you guys want the guy to do. He's gonna have to average 15 points a game for some of you to get off his back.

Honestly, I'd settle for what he's done over the last for games, plus just a tad more consistency when he's handling the puck (which has been better this year all around). He's been shooting more and driving to the net more, both of which are things he absolutely needs to keep doing.

We're not asking for the moon. We're asking for a $7mil, 1st liner to play like one -- with consistency, game in and game out. Don't like this four-game streak wipe out years of inconsistency and turnovers, etc., including a very poor 1st half to start this year.

Right there, that's why I havnt really said a whole bunch about him but this thread was going before I said a word. People bring up Spezza's short comings and look at the overall picture of The Sens and the game being played and people act like he is being bashed for no reason.

I agree with you guys on that front, he does need to shoot more and drive the net more, but you also have to take into consideration his style of play. He's not a power forward as much as some of you want him to be, he's a play maker. It's just now he's realizing he probably has the best shot on this team and is considerably better than his linemates' (with the exception of Alfredsson).

But the guy is a passer, first and foremost. He's played that way since he was six years old. And people on here just expect that to change. I don't think there's been anything wrong with his game lately and I don't see any reason for his play to regress again like it did earlier this year.

He has to consider it because being a past first guy was killing him in a lot of ways, along with playing on the perimeter. Where do his goals come from? People are talking about how he is playing out of this world right now (he's not) but he has gotten himself into high traffic area's on the ice and it's paying off.

The pass first crap hasnt been working for him for 2 plus years. I dont want him to be anything but productive, smart, and hard working. To be 2 of those 3 he had to change his game, dont care if he was born passing a puck out of his mothers vagina, wasnt working 27 years later.

beerandsens

beerandsens
Sophomore
Sophomore


<BLOCKQUOTE>N4L wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE>rooneypoo wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE>PKC wrote:

He scored a goal yesterday, and almost had another one on what should have certainly been called a penalty shot. I for one think Spezza's been fantastic since he came back from his injury. He just looks like he cares out there.

That end to end rush in OT is the kind of rush very few players in the league can pull off. He basically skated directly at 3 habs with 1 hanging off of him from behind and then went straight through them.

I just don't know what more you guys want the guy to do. He's gonna have to average 15 points a game for some of you to get off his back.
</BLOCKQUOTE>

Honestly, I'd settle for what he's done over the last for games, plus just a tad more consistency when he's handling the puck (which has been better this year all around). He's been shooting more and driving to the net more, both of which are things he absolutely needs to keep doing.

We're not asking for the moon. We're asking for a $7mil, 1st liner to play like one -- with consistency, game in and game out. Don't like this four-game streak wipe out years of inconsistency and turnovers, etc., including a very poor 1st half to start this year.
</BLOCKQUOTE>

Right there, that's why I havnt really said a whole bunch about him but this thread was going before I said a word. People bring up Spezza's short comings and look at the overall picture of The Sens and the game being played and people act like he is being bashed for no reason.
</BLOCKQUOTE>


I agree with you guys on that front, he does need to shoot more and drive the net more, but you also have to take into consideration his style of play. He's not a power forward as much as some of you want him to be, he's a play maker. It's just now he's realizing he probably has the best shot on this team and is considerably better than his linemates' (with the exception of Alfredsson).

But the guy is a passer, first and foremost. He's played that way since he was six years old. And people on here just expect that to change. I don't think there's been anything wrong with his game lately and I don't see any reason for his play to regress again like it did earlier this year.

I don't want him to be a power forward. It's easy to recognize that he is a playmaker, but over the years he has not been a $7mil playmaker in my honest opinion. If his play was this strong for a longer period of time I would have more confidence that his impending NTC isn't a big deal. But this part of his game has been the exception, not the rule, so it's hard to just jump on board and forget all of the negatives we have seen since the cup run.

Hemlock makes a good point stating that Spezza isn't to blame for his own contract. And my goal isn't to blame Spezza. Murray has an opportunity to atone for his mistake if he truly believes he made a mistake and the return is decent.

I understand that people really believe Spezza has been playing good hockey, what I can't understand is how people think you can't even CONSIDER trading the guy... it's true that he would have to play ever better to warrant that much confidence from me and a few other posters here.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 21 of 23]

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 12 ... 20, 21, 22, 23  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum