For the sake of argument. Let's say Ward is not quite as good as Volchenkov but you use Volchenkov to get a forward that's better than 9 of our existing forwards. Do we instantly become a better team overall?
GM Hockey
SeawaySensFan wrote:For the sake of argument. Let's say Ward is not quite as good as Volchenkov but you use Volchenkov to get a forward that's better than 9 of our existing forwards. Do we instantly become a better team overall?
N4L wrote:Yes. A Train isnt worth the money he will or has asked for. Ward is a good short term replacement for a year or two while Ottawa builds that young blueline and could in fact be a nice compliment to them showing them the ropes.
Ward for free, anytime.
SeawaySensFan wrote:For the sake of argument. Let's say Ward is not quite as good as Volchenkov but you use Volchenkov to get a forward that's better than 9 of our existing forwards. Do we instantly become a better team overall?
N4L wrote:asq2 wrote:Aaron Ward just isn't worth it. If Volchenkov moves, Ward cannot be his replacement. You have to replace him with someone of a similar or greater calibre if you want to do anything.
Are you kidding? Short term Ward is on the exact same level as A Train, probably a better overall player too. Hes 36, so what? you are getting him for free and can deal A Train for some serious assets.
asq2 wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:For the sake of argument. Let's say Ward is not quite as good as Volchenkov but you use Volchenkov to get a forward that's better than 9 of our existing forwards. Do we instantly become a better team overall?
Volchenkov is an up-coming UFA. He's not going to get a player better than one of Spezza, Michalek, Alfredsson or Fisher.
The point is moot anyway because Aaron Ward is not Anton Volchenkov.
asq2 wrote:N4L wrote:asq2 wrote:Aaron Ward just isn't worth it. If Volchenkov moves, Ward cannot be his replacement. You have to replace him with someone of a similar or greater calibre if you want to do anything.
Are you kidding? Short term Ward is on the exact same level as A Train, probably a better overall player too. Hes 36, so what? you are getting him for free and can deal A Train for some serious assets.
Right, he's better than our top-pairing defenceman and that's why he's being waived by the last-place team in the league.
You under-rate Volchenkov so much it's absolutely ridiculous.
Last edited by asq2 on Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:52 pm; edited 1 time in total
asq2 wrote:OK, I don't want to even address the idea that Volchenkov isn't a stud defensively, but let's play along with the idea that, as you state, Ward > Volchenkov.
Carolina, the worst team in the league, is not only getting rid of the guy, they're putting this stud of a defenceman on waivers, presumably on re-entry waivers, absorbing half of his cap-hit while getting nothing in return.
Meanwhile, teams are going to let this happen, and then give up a top-4 forward for an inferior defenceman while absorbing his entire cap-hit.
Yeah, the logic behind this isn't absurd at all. There's definitely no questioning the any of the premises or the conclusion of this argument.
EDIT: FFS you make Volchenkov sound like Garnett ****ing Exelby.
asq2 wrote:OK, I don't want to even address the idea that Volchenkov isn't a stud defensively, but let's play along with the idea that, as you state, Ward > Volchenkov.
Carolina, the worst team in the league, is not only getting rid of the guy, they're putting this stud of a defenceman on waivers, presumably on re-entry waivers, absorbing half of his cap-hit while getting nothing in return.
Meanwhile, teams are going to let this happen, and then give up a top-4 forward for an inferior defenceman while absorbing his entire cap-hit.
Yeah, the logic behind this isn't absurd at all. There's definitely no questioning the any of the premises or the conclusion of this argument.
N4L wrote:Whoa whoa, where did I say that? Please quote me.
N4L wrote:Are you kidding? Short term Ward is on the exact same level as A Train, probably a better overall player too. Hes 36, so what?
asq2 wrote:N4L wrote:Whoa whoa, where did I say that? Please quote me.
Here you say Ward is as good as Volchenkov, and probably a better player:N4L wrote:Are you kidding? Short term Ward is on the exact same level as A Train, probably a better overall player too. Hes 36, so what?
You mention salaries, but that's irrelevant since their salary situations are exactly the same. Volchenkov is also a UFA and therefore a rental piece, as is Ward. Thus, age is largely irrelevant as well in the current context of dealing Volchenkov. Anyway, you tell me that I over-rate the importance of age, so I assume that you don't give it too much credence.
You continuously mention that Ward is an adequate and appropriate replacement for Volchenkov, and yet a contending team is not even going to claim Ward off waivers but will be willing to give up "serious assets" for Volchenkov.
So, the syllogism you've constructed is:
Ward and Volchenkov are of the same calibre, Ward probably even greater. Ottawa will be able to claim Ward off of re-entry waivers, also implying that other teams are not interested in Ward. Teams are interested in Volchenkov and will give up serious assets for him, even though there is no difference between he and Ward in salary situation nor calibre. We will be able to move Volchenkov for serious assets while picking up Ward for free. Thus, we can profit from this move.
Frankly, I think that's incredibly absurd.
N4L wrote:Whoa whoa, where did I say that? Please quote me.
A Train could very well be on his way out and Murray might have already kicked the tires, Ward is an ideal short term replacement for A Train.
Carolina is putting him on waivers because he is abviously tough to trade at that salary and any team giving up an asset for him. Carolina is team that is going to go through the rebuild as well. You think Whitney last the year there as well? No shot.
Ward is a good NHL D man that, paired with Phillips will be a very effective pair. Again, Ward is 100% capable of being a shut down D man in The NHL still and last year proves that.
As for A Train, he isnt a stud, he's a good D man that is very effective in what he does. He is not much different the Komiserek, a bit more offensive upside.
Dont be putting words in my mouth.
N4L wrote:Carolina is putting him on waivers because he is abviously tough to trade at that salary and any team giving up an asset for him. Carolina is team that is going to go through the rebuild as well. You think Whitney last the year there as well? No shot.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|