Apparently the deal is done and it will in fact be a 3 way deal.
GM Hockey
jamvan wrote:Apparently the deal is done and it will in fact be a 3 way deal.
asq2 wrote:rooneypoo wrote:If true, this deal makes me nauseous.
I really like that Cogliano got included, and I confess that Smid has a lot of potential. Penner might thrive, but he's definitely negative value right now.
But this deal does very little to replace Heater's offence or to add pieces that we need (such as a high scoring prospect or an AHL ready goalie or additional draft picks). Smid gives us, what, 9 defenceman?
I will not be happy if the final deal looks exactly like this. There ought to be at least a prospect / pick included, and/or someone like Smith going the other way.
And, yes, if true, I do think it will (and should) cost BM his job. I know he was in a bad spot, but if true this is a bad deal.
Agreed.
It looks much more palatable if you add the name Magnus Pääjärvi-Svensson to it, though.
jamvan wrote:Apparently the deal is done and it will in fact be a 3 way deal.
SpezDispenser wrote:jamvan wrote:Apparently the deal is done and it will in fact be a 3 way deal.
Please be awesome!
jamvan wrote:This is f'ing cray. Heatl;ey has apparetnly said no, despite teh edmonton players being told they were traded.
dennycrane wrote:From Off The Posts:
Dany Heatley
Has killed the deal.
He will play in Ottawa next season.
He will not go to Edmonton!
What if Melnyk insisted that Murray take the best offer available before midnight in order to save the 4M. Surely that is plausible.rooneypoo wrote:If true, this deal makes me nauseous.
I really like that Cogliano got included, and I confess that Smid has a lot of potential. Penner might thrive, but he's definitely negative value right now.
But this deal does very little to replace Heater's offence or to add pieces that we need (such as a high scoring prospect or an AHL ready goalie or additional draft picks). Smid gives us, what, 9 defenceman?
I will not be happy if the final deal looks exactly like this. There ought to be at least a prospect / pick included, and/or someone like Smith going the other way.
And, yes, if true, I do think it will (and should) cost BM his job. I know he was in a bad spot, but if true this is a bad deal.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum