VOTE - Ottawa Senators Top Prospects: #1 (2015)

Flo The Action wrote:You ladies are terrible.


Top prospect simply means highest upside combined with possibility of achieving those expectations. Not in one year but in the long run. In other words in the players NHL career. And yes it can't be evaluated after one year.
Now quit your Wing Dang Doodle and contribute.


I voted for pumpel simply because he really looks like he's gonna be a good top 6 forward and his chances to succeed are looking really good. I like Paul but I'm not sure if he's top 6 or top 9. I would probably rate chabot ahead of him right now.

Ev wrote:you know even if you do the rankings by draft position only, it's still close to actual rankings IMO.

Chabot
White
Puempel
Gagne
Englund
Chlapik
Prince
Driedger
Hogberg
Paul
Lindberg

SpezDispensed wrote:It's the guy who has the most chance of succeeding in the NHL IMO.  I picked White because of all the guys we have, I think when he makes the NHL he'll make the biggest impact.

Flo The Action wrote:

SpezDispensed wrote:It's the guy who has the most chance of succeeding in the NHL IMO.  I picked White because of all the guys we have, I think when he makes the NHL he'll make the biggest impact.

Really? I think there's a lot of debate about his upside. He's another guy that could also end up being a top 9. I don't know where I stand on him as well. It seems like he does a. Lot of things right but there's questions about his ability to manifacture offence. I guess it will be interesting to see how well the organization get these guys to develop. Without many pure skills type of guys it's not the same learning curve.

Flo The Action wrote:

SpezDispensed wrote:It's the guy who has the most chance of succeeding in the NHL IMO.  I picked White because of all the guys we have, I think when he makes the NHL he'll make the biggest impact.

Really? I think there's a lot of debate about his upside. He's another guy that could also end up being a top 9. I don't know where I stand on him as well. It seems like he does a. Lot of things right but there's questions about his ability to manifacture offence. I guess it will be interesting to see how well the organization get these guys to develop. Without many pure skills type of guys it's not the same learning curve.

Ev wrote:you know even if you do the rankings by draft position only, it's still close to actual rankings IMO.

Chabot
White
Puempel
Gagne
Englund
Chlapik
Prince
Driedger
Hogberg
Paul
Lindberg

Flo The Action wrote:

A lot of people overlook prince it seems. The guy has a good chance to crack the roster this year.

Ev wrote:you know even if you do the rankings by draft position only, it's still close to actual rankings IMO.

Chabot
White
Puempel
Gagne
Englund
Chlapik
Prince
Driedger
Hogberg
Paul
Lindberg

NEELY wrote:Seen enough of Paul to believe he's the best player not playing for the Sens right now.  The guy has absolutely everything, could maybe be a little faster but so can Ryan Getzlaf.

wprager wrote:

Ev wrote:you know even if you do the rankings by draft position only, it's still close to actual rankings IMO.

Chabot
White
Puempel
Gagne
Englund
Chlapik
Prince
Driedger
Hogberg
Paul
Lindberg

Wikstrand?

wprager wrote:

NEELY wrote:Seen enough of Paul to believe he's the best player not playing for the Sens right now.  The guy has absolutely everything, could maybe be a little faster but so can Ryan Getzlaf.

Not to argue (as I voted Paul, too) but where have you "seen enough"?  You've always discounted the WJC and, IIRC, you weren't exactly full of praise over his performance.  Did you watch a lot of Battalion games?