wprager
Administrator
Number of posts : 52830
Age : 62
Location : Kanata
Favorite Team : Ottawa
Registration date : 2008-08-05
sandysensfan wrote: shabbs wrote:It seems that a $60M cap in 2013/14 is the new hill the NHL will die on. NHLPA has come down to $65M and added in second compliance buyout...
So going from $70.2M to $60M. Heh. Those teams that spent large are going to be in trouble.
The difference is 5M. How about they split it in the middle -- or do it at 63M? The issue is the floor. If the Cap ceiling is 65M then the floor is 49M.. which the NHL thinks is too high. Why don't they have a $20M or $25M flat difference between the high and the low? It's always been the floor causing the problems... not the high.
There has also been reports (Eklund again) that the NHL may consider a 30% salary variance within the contracts. Now that's more than the NHLPA requested... so what does the NHL want back? At least... if that is indeed the truth...
Just saw this:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/hockey/globe-on-hockey/why-the-nhls-push-for-a-variance-limit-matters/article6928533/
According to that, the 30% comes with a 60% minimum -- meaning the lowest the salary can get to is 60% of the first year. So you can go 30% in the first year, but then left with only 10% for the remainder. No chance for a back-dive.
_________________
Hey, I don't have all the answers. In life, to be honest, I've failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my wife. I love my life. And I wish you my kind of success.
- Dicky Fox