Trade Bonanza 2012! Speculation, Rumours, the Works!

SeawaySensFan wrote:

Riprock wrote:

Number Twenty Nine wrote:Brian Lee gone = end of Muckler era officially

Brian Murray has shown me that he suck ar$e at deadline day trades - Commodore, Stillman, The Expert, Cullen etc. all gonzo...

But the Fisher and Kelly trades were good, and this year he got started really early getting Turris and a few days ago Big Ben

Yup. And guys like Stillman and Cullen were brought in to "get Fish going" and he just dragged them down.

NEELY wrote:I think Lee had turned himself into a nice NHL D man but this does open up a spot as Wideman, Blood, and possibly Claeson will be stepping into Bingo next year.

I honestly think this is a pretty lateral move but you will get more offense from Gilroy than Lee.

Riprock wrote:Rangers suck. I'll personally trade them Gilroy back for B Dubs

Number Twenty Nine wrote:my point is the guy says he won't go out and get a rental, and then goes out and gets a rental

Number Twenty Nine wrote:my point is the guy says he won't go out and get a rental, and then goes out and gets a rental

shabbs wrote:

Number Twenty Nine wrote:my point is the guy says he won't go out and get a rental, and then goes out and gets a rental

Unless he knows he can sign him... we'll see I guess.

cash wrote:

Riprock wrote:Rangers suck. I'll personally trade them Gilroy back for B Dubs

there's a pretty big + coming back from our side

sandysensfan wrote:

NEELY wrote:I think Lee had turned himself into a nice NHL D man but this does open up a spot as Wideman, Blood, and possibly Claeson will be stepping into Bingo next year.

I honestly think this is a pretty lateral move but you will get more offense from Gilroy than Lee.

OR Ryan Suter.... LOL

SeawaySensFan wrote:

shabbs wrote:

Number Twenty Nine wrote:my point is the guy says he won't go out and get a rental, and then goes out and gets a rental

Unless he knows he can sign him... we'll see I guess.

Better chance of signing RFA Lee, no?

shabbs wrote:

SeawaySensFan wrote:

shabbs wrote:

Number Twenty Nine wrote:my point is the guy says he won't go out and get a rental, and then goes out and gets a rental

Unless he knows he can sign him... we'll see I guess.

Better chance of signing RFA Lee, no?

For sure... but maybe Murray sees something in Gilroy that he likes more than what he sees in Lee.

Number Twenty Nine wrote:Looks the sun is setting on the Pancake express, sorry SD.....

Big Ev wrote:I don't get the idea that it gives them more flexibility. So what if Lee was an RFA, if they don't want him he was basically a UFA.

Number Twenty Nine wrote:the only flexibility is Murray grabbing his ankles.....