Who do people want to take at 2 or 3 if we get one of those?
GM Hockey
PTFlea wrote:Who do people want to take at 2 or 3 if we get one of those?
tim1_2 wrote:PTFlea wrote:Who do people want to take at 2 or 3 if we get one of those?
Diddle, I really have no idea. There's a pretty diverse group of players after Dahlin....Tkachuk (LW) has 8G in 38GP the NCAA, but he's a big winger who people rave about, Svechnikov (RW) has 40G in the OHL, Zadina has 44G in the Q, Bouchard (D) has 87 points in the OHL and is pretty big, and Boqvist (D) is a small Swedish defenceman who seems a lot like Karlsson..... I'd be happy with any of these guys. It's so hard to compare them.
PTFlea wrote:tim1_2 wrote:PTFlea wrote:Who do people want to take at 2 or 3 if we get one of those?
Diddle, I really have no idea. There's a pretty diverse group of players after Dahlin....Tkachuk (LW) has 8G in 38GP the NCAA, but he's a big winger who people rave about, Svechnikov (RW) has 40G in the OHL, Zadina has 44G in the Q, Bouchard (D) has 87 points in the OHL and is pretty big, and Boqvist (D) is a small Swedish defenceman who seems a lot like Karlsson..... I'd be happy with any of these guys. It's so hard to compare them.
Yeah, those were the 4 that caught my eye, especially Zadina, but I know nothing about it really.
Lagoon wrote:Svechnikov is not the clear #2, but that’s cool that you would pick him. I’m torn on him and Zadina just like mostly everyone else, all the rankings and mocks that I’ve seen.
Ev wrote:Svechnikov is the clear #2 and the player I would draft #2, but I wish there was an elite centre available. I just don't care about wingers this high for the most part.
Ev wrote:Lagoon wrote:Svechnikov is not the clear #2, but that’s cool that you would pick him. I’m torn on him and Zadina just like mostly everyone else, all the rankings and mocks that I’ve seen.
That's not correct. He is by far the clear #2. I really don't care what you have to say in reply to this, because I don't respect you nor value your opinion at all, but this is just fact.
tim1_2 wrote:Ev wrote:Lagoon wrote:Svechnikov is not the clear #2, but that’s cool that you would pick him. I’m torn on him and Zadina just like mostly everyone else, all the rankings and mocks that I’ve seen.
That's not correct. He is by far the clear #2. I really don't care what you have to say in reply to this, because I don't respect you nor value your opinion at all, but this is just fact.
Actually Ev, you are not correct. There are many lists available on the internet compiled by people that know more than you and I.
https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/sportsnets-2018-nhl-draft-prospect-rankings-march/
https://www.tsn.ca/craig-s-list-bouchard-rocketing-up-draft-board-1.1031499
http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/article/2018-draft-rankings-dahlin-still-the-darling
http://www.eliteprospects.com/draftcenter.php?year=2018&layout=&ranking=Rank6
http://www.eliteprospects.com/draftcenter.php?year=2018&layout=&ranking=Rank4
Svechnikov is #2 on some lists, but not all. There is far from a consensus as to who will go #2.
tim1_2 wrote:Ev wrote:Lagoon wrote:Svechnikov is not the clear #2, but that’s cool that you would pick him. I’m torn on him and Zadina just like mostly everyone else, all the rankings and mocks that I’ve seen.
That's not correct. He is by far the clear #2. I really don't care what you have to say in reply to this, because I don't respect you nor value your opinion at all, but this is just fact.
Actually Ev, you are not correct. There are many lists available on the internet compiled by people that know more than you and I.
https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/sportsnets-2018-nhl-draft-prospect-rankings-march/
https://www.tsn.ca/craig-s-list-bouchard-rocketing-up-draft-board-1.1031499
http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/article/2018-draft-rankings-dahlin-still-the-darling
http://www.eliteprospects.com/draftcenter.php?year=2018&layout=&ranking=Rank6
http://www.eliteprospects.com/draftcenter.php?year=2018&layout=&ranking=Rank4
Svechnikov is #2 on some lists, but not all. There is far from a consensus as to who will go #2.
Ev wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Ev wrote:Lagoon wrote:Svechnikov is not the clear #2, but that’s cool that you would pick him. I’m torn on him and Zadina just like mostly everyone else, all the rankings and mocks that I’ve seen.
That's not correct. He is by far the clear #2. I really don't care what you have to say in reply to this, because I don't respect you nor value your opinion at all, but this is just fact.
Actually Ev, you are not correct. There are many lists available on the internet compiled by people that know more than you and I.
https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/sportsnets-2018-nhl-draft-prospect-rankings-march/
https://www.tsn.ca/craig-s-list-bouchard-rocketing-up-draft-board-1.1031499
http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/article/2018-draft-rankings-dahlin-still-the-darling
http://www.eliteprospects.com/draftcenter.php?year=2018&layout=&ranking=Rank6
http://www.eliteprospects.com/draftcenter.php?year=2018&layout=&ranking=Rank4
Svechnikov is #2 on some lists, but not all. There is far from a consensus as to who will go #2.
I didn’t say he would be the #2 in every single ranking. But that doesn’t matter at all. Only Bob McKenzies ranking really matters. Anyone who knows anything about the draft and prospects has a clear cut #2 right now
wprager wrote:Bob McKenzie doesn't do prospect rankings. He just compiles many other lists. If there Sens pick second they are likely to pick Zadina. In fact, because of the KHL threat many other GMs would also avoid drafting a Russian player.
Lagoon wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Ev wrote:Lagoon wrote:Svechnikov is not the clear #2, but that’s cool that you would pick him. I’m torn on him and Zadina just like mostly everyone else, all the rankings and mocks that I’ve seen.
That's not correct. He is by far the clear #2. I really don't care what you have to say in reply to this, because I don't respect you nor value your opinion at all, but this is just fact.
Actually Ev, you are not correct. There are many lists available on the internet compiled by people that know more than you and I.
https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/sportsnets-2018-nhl-draft-prospect-rankings-march/
https://www.tsn.ca/craig-s-list-bouchard-rocketing-up-draft-board-1.1031499
http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/article/2018-draft-rankings-dahlin-still-the-darling
http://www.eliteprospects.com/draftcenter.php?year=2018&layout=&ranking=Rank6
http://www.eliteprospects.com/draftcenter.php?year=2018&layout=&ranking=Rank4
Svechnikov is #2 on some lists, but not all. There is far from a consensus as to who will go #2.
That is correct. I could post some more links for you and I as well, but what is the point? He knows he is wrong now and that is what matters when someone pretends to know everything.
Ev wrote:That's not correct. He is by far the clear #2. I really don't care what you have to say in reply to this, because I don't respect you nor value your opinion at all, but this is just fact.
Ev wrote:I didn’t say he would be the #2 in every single ranking. But that doesn’t matter at all. Only Bob McKenzies ranking really matters. Anyone who knows anything about the draft and prospects has a clear cut #2 right now
Ev wrote:That’s not correct about McKenzies list. His list is made based on the opinions of actual nhl scouts and executives. He does not compile other people’s lists. That’s why his are the gold standard.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum