Well, the Sens have and we all know he is the One.
GM Hockey
Ev wrote:wprager wrote:Stone with 4 goals and 10 points through 8 games. Tied for 6th in the tournament and tied for the team lead with Brassard. How is he not a lock for the World Cup team?
I think he deserves World Cup consideration but certainly not because of this tournament. This tournament is irrelevant, theyre playing against bad competition throughout.
SeawaySensFan wrote:Ev wrote:wprager wrote:Stone with 4 goals and 10 points through 8 games. Tied for 6th in the tournament and tied for the team lead with Brassard. How is he not a lock for the World Cup team?
I think he deserves World Cup consideration but certainly not because of this tournament. This tournament is irrelevant, theyre playing against bad competition throughout.
It's irrelevant to the extent that he's a Top 4 Canadian RW in the NHL no matter what. It might be a little relevant to the extent that he's shown he can thrive with limited minutes if they have him slotted as a 4th liner in a World Cup context.
Michallica wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:Ev wrote:wprager wrote:Stone with 4 goals and 10 points through 8 games. Tied for 6th in the tournament and tied for the team lead with Brassard. How is he not a lock for the World Cup team?
I think he deserves World Cup consideration but certainly not because of this tournament. This tournament is irrelevant, theyre playing against bad competition throughout.
It's irrelevant to the extent that he's a Top 4 Canadian RW in the NHL no matter what. It might be a little relevant to the extent that he's shown he can thrive with limited minutes if they have him slotted as a 4th liner in a World Cup context.
He's an ottawa senator....he's not going to get any consideration from hockey canada. Morgan Rielly likely has a higher chance than Mark Stone.
Michallica wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:Ev wrote:wprager wrote:Stone with 4 goals and 10 points through 8 games. Tied for 6th in the tournament and tied for the team lead with Brassard. How is he not a lock for the World Cup team?
I think he deserves World Cup consideration but certainly not because of this tournament. This tournament is irrelevant, theyre playing against bad competition throughout.
It's irrelevant to the extent that he's a Top 4 Canadian RW in the NHL no matter what. It might be a little relevant to the extent that he's shown he can thrive with limited minutes if they have him slotted as a 4th liner in a World Cup context.
He's an ottawa senator....he's not going to get any consideration from hockey canada. Morgan Rielly likely has a higher chance than Mark Stone.
tim1_2 wrote:I watched some of the game against the States, and the Americans were horrible.
SeawaySensFan wrote:I think Canada had 7 or 8 shots befored the Finns registered their 1st. Then Canada started playing undisciplined and we know the rest. Lesson learned hopefully.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|