tim1_2 wrote:Meh. It's easy to Dung on the Bishop/Conacher trade in hindsight, but at the time it was a reasonable risk to take. Nobody said at the time that it was a horrible trade for Ottawa.
I agree with you on this.
tim1_2 wrote:Meh. It's easy to Dung on the Bishop/Conacher trade in hindsight, but at the time it was a reasonable risk to take. Nobody said at the time that it was a horrible trade for Ottawa.
22_4_ever wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Meh. It's easy to Dung on the Bishop/Conacher trade in hindsight, but at the time it was a reasonable risk to take. Nobody said at the time that it was a horrible trade for Ottawa.
Yep, but I was one of the few that at the time said Andersson would have been better to trade. You would have got more and the upside of Bishop was evident at that time. Not hindsight, and while i never said it was horrible I never liked it.
Ev wrote:the reasoning is he's Dung and they can send him to Bingo
Ev wrote:the reasoning is he's Dung and they can send him to Bingo
Ev wrote:22_4_ever wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Meh. It's easy to Dung on the Bishop/Conacher trade in hindsight, but at the time it was a reasonable risk to take. Nobody said at the time that it was a horrible trade for Ottawa.
Yep, but I was one of the few that at the time said Andersson would have been better to trade. You would have got more and the upside of Bishop was evident at that time. Not hindsight, and while i never said it was horrible I never liked it.
trading your #1 goalie when you're going for the playoffs makes no sense
22_4_ever wrote:Ev wrote:22_4_ever wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Meh. It's easy to Dung on the Bishop/Conacher trade in hindsight, but at the time it was a reasonable risk to take. Nobody said at the time that it was a horrible trade for Ottawa.
Yep, but I was one of the few that at the time said Andersson would have been better to trade. You would have got more and the upside of Bishop was evident at that time. Not hindsight, and while i never said it was horrible I never liked it.
trading your #1 goalie when you're going for the playoffs makes no sense
maybe not, but you can't say that bishop or lehner were playing poorly...in fact they both carried this team for a long stretch while Anderson was out. So it makes more sense than you think.
SpezDispenser wrote:I simply don't get how Murray couldn't have gotten ANY asset for him. A late pick, anything...
Looks so bad on him for that trade...
Ev wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:I simply don't get how Murray couldn't have gotten ANY asset for him. A late pick, anything...
Looks so bad on him for that trade...
It doesn't look that bad. You're not going to win every deal.
SpezDispenser wrote:Mike Weaver apparently heading to Montreal. Not sure who that is, but a trade apparently is happening.
SeawaySensFan wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:Mike Weaver apparently heading to Montreal. Not sure who that is, but a trade apparently is happening.
Yeah, well Mike Weaver isn't sure who you are. So there.
Cap'n Clutch wrote:SeawaySensFan wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:Mike Weaver apparently heading to Montreal. Not sure who that is, but a trade apparently is happening.
Yeah, well Mike Weaver isn't sure who you are. So there.
Now that was a solid farm D man for the SIM back in the day.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum