NEELY wrote:
If you are established in a city that's fine, it's your home. Why don't you think big name UFA's come to Canada? Who was the last really big name to sign in any Canadian city? Gonchar? Only reason he did was because no team in the NHL would give him a 3 year deal. Camellari? Was in Canada already and was offered a stupid amount every other team refused to pay by the Canadians.
So because there are few examples of FA's signing in canada, that is your argument. But when a player re-signs, it is different, because they might as well stay since they are already there. But when players leave non-Canadian cities for a different one after many years, its not the same.
Stop trying to justify BS because of what you "believe in". Guys want to play for big money, with nice weather, away from the stupid Canadian media. Nash doesn't want to play in Canada buddy, get with it. Neither did Heatley. Neither would anyone asking for a trade that has a high profile.
It's not what I believe in, I am making a valid argument, something you have never done. In fact, if anyone is arguing from belief, it's you. It is your belief that nobody signs in Canada. It's your belief people prefer warm climates over typical Canadian ones. So is it only justifiable for you to have beliefs and nobody else?
Anyways, like most things you are completely out to lunch because you have a very uneducated opinion. Par for the course I guess.
Again, because I have a different argument than you, I am automatically wrong. What is uneducated about my argument? That I broke your argument down and contradicted you, so you personally attack me?