NEELY wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:NEELY wrote:
If Lehner is the piece they truly want for Nash... I don't see how you don't make that move. You add Nash to your lineup without taking taking a top 6 forward or top 4 D man out of it... How do you not make that trade given that the others pieces are reasonable.
If It's Lehner/Foligno/1st/mid tier prospect... you do it.
All of this is off the assumption salary isn't an issue either.
Because Lehner is everything we've ever wanted here in Ottawa, from his attitude to his skills to his 'cocky' demeanour. I view him as the most important bridge from Anderson to our next starter - especially given the almost too perfect timeline where Lehner would get one more year in the AHL, then 2 years as backup to Anderson, then to the starter role with as much mentoring as the Sens organization can heap on him. I bet he'd be the backbone to our franchise, a Henrik Lundqvist behind a much better team than the Rangers have.
Of all the people, I would expect you to understand my burning desire to keep Lehner, even if it means Nash is off the table.
Lehner is my favorite prospect by a mile... doesn't mean I don't make that trade. You can draft another goalie, sign for one, trade for one, w/e. Fact of the matter is Lehner isn't a roster player in Ottawa and getting a player like Nash for him is absolutely a no brainer. I love Lehner and I'm not a huge Nash fan, but I'm going to call a spade a spade here and you make that deal 100% of the time.
I guess that's where we differ. I see a young Lundqvist in Lehner and I don't want to let that go - especially in this goalie graveyard.