A guy that MIGHT be a good fit if available is Ryan Smyth.
GM Hockey
SpezDispenser wrote:wprager wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:Riprock wrote:I think the Sens will try to land Bryan Allen.
As long as the cost is very low maybe, otherwise what does he really bring that Carkner doesn't? Experience in the regular season maybe, but he's got no real playoff experience at all and has been pretty underwhelming the last few years.
Not sure...
A left-hand shot.
Meh, we have Cowen, Phillips, Kuba for that. Gonchar too.
NEELY wrote:A guy that MIGHT be a good fit if available is Ryan Smyth.
SpezDispenser wrote:May I ask why we even need a forward? Unless it's someone like Bobby Ryan or Perry, why would we do that?
Hoags wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:May I ask why we even need a forward? Unless it's someone like Bobby Ryan or Perry, why would we do that?
I think we can do better than Greening and/or Condra in the top-6 (in the long run).
SpezDispenser wrote:
It's working though, right?
How about Cammelleri? I'd love to have that guy and there's like...zero chance he finishes the year in Montreal IMO. 6 million bones is an issue, but if he's free, I'd take him.
Hoags wrote:SpezDispenser wrote:
It's working though, right?
How about Cammelleri? I'd love to have that guy and there's like...zero chance he finishes the year in Montreal IMO. 6 million bones is an issue, but if he's free, I'd take him.
It's not a question of whether if it's working or not, it's how can we possibly make it better. For example Replace Greening with Parise on the top line ... Move Greening down and replace Condra and you've got a leftie on Turris's line and Condra can be somewhere else on the right side.
Cammaleri is small, overpaid and doesn't strike as a 200ft player that would fit with MacLean's system. Plus I don't think he's the best character in the locker room, his latest comments about the Habs playing like 'losers'.
SpezDispenser wrote:May I ask why we even need a forward? Unless it's someone like Bobby Ryan or Perry, why would we do that? We're what, top 5 in the league in goals...what we need is a guy to replace Carkner (no offense!) on the 3rd pairing - or at least make Carkner the 7th guy.
SpezDispenser wrote:
I think he's telling it like it is - and I think his attitude is actually pretty good from what I've heard.
Number Twenty Nine wrote:Anderson for Elliott
Hoags wrote:Number Twenty Nine wrote:Anderson for Elliott
Isn't it safe to say Elliott would never post such numbers here in Ottawa ?
Number Twenty Nine wrote:I always liked Elliott. It was not his fault. He was just thrown into a situation with too high expectations. He let guys like Buffet get to him. etc.
I'm glad he's having his day in the sun....
Number Twenty Nine wrote:I always liked Elliott. It was not his fault. He was just thrown into a situation with too high expectations. He let guys like Buffet get to him. etc.
I'm glad he's having his day in the sun....
GM Hockey » Breaking Rumours!! » Trade D-Day Speculation » Trade Bonanza 2012! Speculation, Rumours, the Works!
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum