Yeah but Zibanejad better have more upside than Fisher. Because it looks like Couturier sure does.
- Don Brennan
- Don Brennan
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Rate the Sens draft + draft talk Sens related
Big Ev wrote:Yeah but Zibanejad better have more upside than Fisher. Because it looks like Couturier sure does.
- Don Brennan
Big Ev wrote:I just hate it because people actually read his stuff and regurgitate what ever he says like it's gospel.
NEELY wrote:Big Ev wrote:I just hate it because people actually read his stuff and regurgitate what ever he says like it's gospel.
Best thing people can do is not read his crap because the more people do, the more he gets paid.
I used to read it online but I stopped. to much garbage. i prefer the citizen or even Le Droit.spader wrote:NEELY wrote:Big Ev wrote:I just hate it because people actually read his stuff and regurgitate what ever he says like it's gospel.
Best thing people can do is not read his crap because the more people do, the more he gets paid.
Although I did it for other reasons, I think everyone should cancel their Sun subscription. Get yer hockey talk online and solve a Sudoku on the bus.
When they call to ask you to renew, tell them that you would, if not for Buffet and CheapShots.
Dash wrote:Funny thing is, so many people have this fear of Zibanejad being similar to Mike Fisher. Think about it, that's not a bad thing. If you draft a guy who ends up playing in 11 NHL seasons, how is that bad? Much better than not playing in any NHL games. Certainly, we all hope that our draft picks become the next Crosby or Stamkos, but really, that's not likely.
Dash wrote:Nobody can predict what type of player he ends up being. We can all hope for him to become a superstar like Forsberg, but he could be a Winchester. There's no telling. If he makes the NHL, great. If he is our 2nd line C, awesome.
Dash wrote:Nobody can predict what type of player he ends up being. We can all hope for him to become a superstar like Forsberg, but he could be a Winchester. There's no telling. If he makes the NHL, great. If he is our 2nd line C, awesome.
Obviously I'd rather he reach his upsides but a player like Hartnel is a very serviceable type of player in any organization. I think it will be more interesting once we start seeing him play the NA game. even in the rookie camp but more so if he plays pre-season. Will give us a good taste of things to come. If we want to get to that we probably have to get him under contract for by the 15th. Does anybody know what HE wants? Not what he said to the media but what he really wants?NEELY wrote:Dash wrote:Nobody can predict what type of player he ends up being. We can all hope for him to become a superstar like Forsberg, but he could be a Winchester. There's no telling. If he makes the NHL, great. If he is our 2nd line C, awesome.
No he couldnt, haha. He already has as many professional goals as Winchester and he just turned 18.
His downside is a Fisher/Hartnel type. His upside is probably that of a Foresberg who he does play a lot like IMO.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|