rooneypoo wrote:stempniaksen wrote:Cap'n Clutch wrote:SDH89 wrote:sandysensfan wrote:These kids are 17-18 yrs old are the not? They still have time to grow.
I think you draft -- SKILL. Nobody can teach god-given talent. Kids can add muscle and grow.. but the natural talent is just there. You can build around that. Teach other aspects of the game.. but the talent sure helps.
So who has the most NATURAL talent of RNH, Landeskog or Coutorier?
From what I've read around here, and other sites, RNH is supposed to have the most high-end talent.
From what I've read it appears as though RNH has the most POTENTIAL to be a lights out talented star who PROJECTS to be better than Landeskog is currently. Like I said before it's bird in hand for me.
Chris Kelly is better than Landeskog right now too, see what I did there? I don't begrudge people who want Landeskog as he is a supreme talent, but people have to start projecting over a longer term if we want the best player from this draft.
I'm sure when we drafted Erik "150 pounds soaking wet" Karlsson that he wasn't the most best player at that spot, but he was, in the eyes of our scouts, the most talented. And we all know that has turned out superbly for us.
I think people need to be aware that the 'best long term player' might not be enough for Melnyk if he wants the 'best player right now' to step in & re-energize the fanbase & sell tickets.
I'm not saying this is right or wrong. I'm saying that this may well be the reality we're facing.
Time will tell.
Maybe I'm just interpreting it wrong, but when he says: "we're gonna do what needs to be done to bring a cup in Ottawa, be it in 1, 2 or 5 years", I assume he is willing to wait for the best projected player to mature.