GAME DAY: L.A. Kings @ Ottawa Senators - 7:30pm ET - MON. Nov. 22, 2010

PKC wrote:

rooneypoo wrote:

cash wrote:

Number Twenty Nine wrote:if not for the GWG, we'd all be blasting Spezza this morning. I don't mind a horrific give away that leads to a goal if a player atones for it. I think Spezza circa 2010 did that. I agree, he needs to clean up his act in his own end.

I'd be pretty interested to see the reaction from fans if things happened in a different order. Imagine: a) Spezza scores that same goal, only it was our 2nd of the game, b) Smyth's goal counts but happens at the end of the 2nd period, and c) Kopitar's goal ties the game with a couple minutes left in the 3rd and we lose in OT.

Do you think Ottawa fans would give a Dung about the beauty goal? I think the point is that that type of play is pretty much unacceptable. It was possibly the most amateur giveaway you'll see in the league this year.

I dunno about that. That giveaway on Spezza's first shift of his first game this year might have to take precedence.

Needless to say, I agree wholeheartedly with what you're saying. Or the other way around.

I'm quite disappointed with you rooney. Surely someone of your purported letter would recognize a preposterously fallacious argument when they saw one. "Agreeing wholeheartedly with it" is stupefying to say the least.

WTF? cash said "I think the point is that that type of play is pretty much unacceptable." Which is the point with which I agree wholeheartedly.

Roche's argument above, btw, is the preposterous one. Spezza created the 0-1 down low in the first two minutes of the game (where Brown was all alone and Lecaire made a huge save). Carkner was on the guy, and Spezza left the front of the net to join in, leaving Brown open.

Watch the first 10 seconds of the TSN highlights in the game. That's the play he's referencing. You serious think that's a great decision on Spezza's part, to double cover Kopitar and leave Brown and the front of the net wide open? Yikes.

rooneypoo wrote:

WTF? cash said "I think the point is that that type of play is pretty much unacceptable." Which is the point with which I agree wholeheartedly.

Roche's argument above, btw, is the preposterous one. Spezza created the 0-1 down low in the first two minutes of the game (where Brown was all alone and Lecaire made a huge save). Carkner was on the guy, and Spezza left the front of the net to join in, leaving Brown open.

Watch the first 10 seconds of the TSN highlights in the game. That's the play he's referencing. You serious think that's a great decision on Spezza's part, to double cover Kopitar and leave Brown and the front of the net wide open? Yikes.

I'll take your word for it. It would be nice though to highlight what part you agree with especially when someone posts something as ridiculous as a made up series of hypotheticals and then try to pass it off as justification for their reasoning.

CockRoche wrote:Wing Dang Doodle! Oh my, that is fantastic! I forget what I said there, but your filter is much better anyway.

This may help: Karma is a Wing Dang Doodle.

Did that help?

wprager wrote:

CockRoche wrote:Wing Dang Doodle! Oh my, that is fantastic! I forget what I said there, but your filter is much better anyway.

This may help: Karma is a Wing Dang Doodle.

Did that help?

You better believe it.

Why is it okay to criticize Spezza, even suggest trading him, for his turnover or even at times when he plays poorly, but when it comes to Chris Phillips, it's a different story?

Phillips has been here 10 years and this is the first time I can remember that he has struggled. Also, he is making a lot less than Spezza.

CockRoche wrote:

wprager wrote:

CockRoche wrote:Wing Dang Doodle! Oh my, that is fantastic! I forget what I said there, but your filter is much better anyway.

This may help: Karma is a Wing Dang Doodle.

Did that help?

You better believe it.

I take full credit for all the funny filters you like.

wprager wrote:Phillips has been here 10 years and this is the first time I can remember that he has struggled. Also, he is making a lot less than Spezza.

Can't compute... have had Cap't, Prager, and Big Ev variously agree with me today... *bzzzzzzzzz*

Cap'n Clutch wrote:

CockRoche wrote:

wprager wrote:

CockRoche wrote:Wing Dang Doodle! Oh my, that is fantastic! I forget what I said there, but your filter is much better anyway.

This may help: Karma is a Wing Dang Doodle.

Did that help?

You better believe it.

I take full credit for all the funny filters you like.

Not all ....


Go ahead and try to type:

Leciaire
Hamius
develope
garentee
tallent
schedual
rediculous

talent, leclaire, Hamhuis, guarantee

PKC wrote:

rooneypoo wrote:

WTF? cash said "I think the point is that that type of play is pretty much unacceptable." Which is the point with which I agree wholeheartedly.

Roche's argument above, btw, is the preposterous one. Spezza created the 0-1 down low in the first two minutes of the game (where Brown was all alone and Lecaire made a huge save). Carkner was on the guy, and Spezza left the front of the net to join in, leaving Brown open.

Watch the first 10 seconds of the TSN highlights in the game. That's the play he's referencing. You serious think that's a great decision on Spezza's part, to double cover Kopitar and leave Brown and the front of the net wide open? Yikes.

I'll take your word for it. It would be nice though to highlight what part you agree with especially when someone posts something as ridiculous as a made up series of hypotheticals and then try to pass it off as justification for their reasoning.

Ha! you guys totally misread what I was saying... SSF got it... It's already happened several times in the past, and my point is more about this "making up for it" business than anything else...but w/e...

Also, I so rarely use hypotheticals to prove my point, I'm amazed at the outrage, but w/e...