2010 NHL Draft

asq2 wrote:Of course Pulkkinen goes to Detroit.

They do everything so professionally. They're really professional. I really, really mean that.

Alright, I'm out of here. We don't pick again until the 6th, right?

5'11 swedish RW kid eh, should be really interestiing...

whos knows, may be in 20 years we'll get another 1000 games celebration haha

I see this kid in the Andre Petersson mold. He seems like a real boom/bust type of guy who has some slick offensive abilities.

BTW, which goalie do we take in the 6th?

marakh wrote:5'11 swedish RW kid eh, should be really interestiing...

whos knows, may be in 20 years we'll get another 1000 games celebration haha

Well, one thing we can be sure of is that it'll take him as long (or longer) as it took Alfie to reach the NHL. At that size, he's at least a university degree away.

Sens scout just compared Culek to HAnzal. Mmh...

N4L wrote:

Dash wrote:This might be the most anti-climactic draft in Sens history.

The Sens website is advertising draft day hats and have a jersey and it says "Who will the sens draft in the 2010 1st round?"Answer: Nobody. They will draft a guy who was drafted a year ago.

Then we sit for the 2nd where we had two picks and watch a bunch of good picks waltz by. Then we miss out on Kabanov (who was once dubbed the next Ovechkin) and pass on Pulkinen, the only forward left anyone knows of.

YOu're point?

My point is I am disappointed. I was really looking forward to the possibility of adding a guy that could absolutely be an impact player almost immediately. And I get "-" for that, awesome. Guys can spam the boards with "source?", "updates on the future of Spezza?", personally attack other members, use politically incorrect terminology as a means of insulting people, but express your opinions and your hard earned reputation suffers. Thanks. This might be enough to turn someone away, and I can't believe that I would ever feel this way. I used to enjoy coming here.

stempniaksen wrote:I see this kid in the Andre Petersson mold. He seems like a real boom/bust type of guy who has some slick offensive abilities.

WU18 he had 3 goals in 3 games... not bad against the best possible compition. Small but I dont think this was a pick for next year, haha.

Dash wrote:

N4L wrote:

Dash wrote:This might be the most anti-climactic draft in Sens history.

The Sens website is advertising draft day hats and have a jersey and it says "Who will the sens draft in the 2010 1st round?"Answer: Nobody. They will draft a guy who was drafted a year ago.

Then we sit for the 2nd where we had two picks and watch a bunch of good picks waltz by. Then we miss out on Kabanov (who was once dubbed the next Ovechkin) and pass on Pulkinen, the only forward left anyone knows of.

YOu're point?

My point is I am disappointed. I was really looking forward to the possibility of adding a guy that could absolutely be an impact player almost immediately. And I get "-" for that, awesome. Guys can spam the boards with "source?", "updates on the future of Spezza?", personally attack other members, use politically incorrect terminology as a means of insulting people, but express your opinions and your hard earned reputation suffers. Thanks. This might be enough to turn someone away, and I can't believe that I would ever feel this way. I used to enjoy coming here.

Source?

Kitsyn going to LA at 158 and the Rangers just gave Sanguinetti away

Again, Ill ask, how does Sather have a job!?

Dash wrote:

N4L wrote:

Dash wrote:This might be the most anti-climactic draft in Sens history.

The Sens website is advertising draft day hats and have a jersey and it says "Who will the sens draft in the 2010 1st round?"Answer: Nobody. They will draft a guy who was drafted a year ago.

Then we sit for the 2nd where we had two picks and watch a bunch of good picks waltz by. Then we miss out on Kabanov (who was once dubbed the next Ovechkin) and pass on Pulkinen, the only forward left anyone knows of.

YOu're point?

My point is I am disappointed. I was really looking forward to the possibility of adding a guy that could absolutely be an impact player almost immediately. And I get "-" for that, awesome. Guys can spam the boards with "source?", "updates on the future of Spezza?", personally attack other members, use politically incorrect terminology as a means of insulting people, but express your opinions and your hard earned reputation suffers. Thanks. This might be enough to turn someone away, and I can't believe that I would ever feel this way. I used to enjoy coming here.

For whinning about not getting an impact forward with the 16th pick or worse, and thinking you know better than guys who get paid to do this stuff 365? Yeah, a (-) is pretty much well-earned.

...and that "hard earned reputation" is on an internet msg board...grow up.

Sens take RW Mark Stone from Brandon at 179.

Hahahahhaa a REP point on an internet message board, are we kidding here? Im glad Gohan is back because at least I can have a good convo with him and some others.

Anyways, Mark Stone eh... seems like a decent 6th round pick... good numbers on a strong team, cant really complain. Big kid too, 6'3.

Not a lot of NCAA's going in this draft...

Gohan wrote:...and that "hard earned reputation" is on an internet msg board...grow up.

Dash did bring us the Robin Lehner interview.

Everyone take it easy and treat others with respect. No one needs to be upset, everyone's entitled to an opinion.