wprager wrote:
My issue with the above is that, for one, this is McAlpine paving the way for Dany to say nothing worth saying. All through this Heatley has been doing nothing that would benefit this team. The only reason he is "talking" now is that he was pretty much given an ultimatum by Yzerman. Again, he's doing this for purely selfish reasons -- to preserve his spot on Team Canada. If not for that, we probably wouldn't see or hear from Heatley until he came to camp, and then he'd sit in the corner of the room with his earbuds in his ears.
OK, so maybe that was a little over the top, but the point still remains: he is only doing *this* for himself, so to couch it by saying he is not going to say anything out of respect for the Senators just makes me cringe.
As to the rest of your comments, why didn't he want out *when* Emery and McGrattan and Redden were here? Isn't the situation better now, then when those fiends were on the team? And as for mismanagement, why wasn't he quitting when Paddock ran the team into the ground after that 15-3 start? Or when Hartsburg came in and told everyone to play the trap, which destroyed their confidence? In Clouston we have finally found a coach whose system plays to the strengths of the team assembled for him by the GM, and who actually practices the accountability that Hartsburg only preached.
Even if he's only speaking now because people in positions of power with Team Canada have demanded he do so, that says absolutely nothing about his reasons for not speaking between early June and now. He may well be not speaking because what he has to say will hurt the team or his (former?) teammates, and he knows it.
In any event, I fail to see how holing himself up in Kelowna and getting positively demonized by the fanbase and eaten alive in the PR battle because of his silence is automatically "selfish" or "me-centric." From his perspective, it would have been a hell of a lot easier just to step up and push the team or organization under the bus to save his own reputation. Think anyone would be bad-mouthing Heatley right now if he came out and said, oh I dunno, drug use is rampant in the locker room, for instance, and he doesn't see a future for that team? That would have saved his skin immediately. Stepping up to say something like thhat doesn't take balls; it takes a selfish, disrespectful nature. It takes real balls to shut your mouth and take one for the team, tho' -- which may well be among the reasons why he's been silent for so long.
A lot of people around here have been way too quick to judge on this issue, and the anger and resentment are clouding judgments. We don't know he real reasons for wanting out, and we should all be smart enough to realize that if that specific information on that front ever got out, it would damage either the team or one of its prime assets (making him virtually unmoveable, in fact). If he comes out and says anything other than "I'm sorry, I goofed, take me back," it's a lose-lose situation for him to explain his reasons.
As for the point you make about "why now, why not after 2007-08?", it's really beside the point. It's Heatley's perception of the facts, not that facts themselves as we collectively perceive them that matter. Maybe those things (Paddock, Emery, McGratton, etc.) are all contributing factors -- cumulative events that lead him, slowly and irrevocably, to his decision. Who knows. What matters is that, regardless of his reasons for wanting off the team, there's just no way to spin it so it doesn't seriously damage the reputation of the team or one of its prime assets.
I hope we never hear the 'whole story' behind his request, at least not while Heatley's here and on our team. If that news gets out while he's still here, it would be a very bad day for the Senators organization.