davetherave wrote:A few things to bear in mind....
As far as the letter from Heatley requesting the trade goes, its potential impact depends on the wording of the no-trade clause and the contract itself.
When dealing with contracts, a number of them will contain a specific paragraph saying that the Parties agree to the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement as contained therein, and that no subsequent document may be construed as altering or voiding the contract, and that only unless the Parties specifically agree to do so.
This gets very, very complicated...and can have lawyers arguing for months.
And as far as Edmonton is concerned, they are not, as far as I know, obligated to take the deal if the terms of the deal are changed.
I hope the guy just smartens up enough to realize that maybe it's best to just move along.