Who were the 7D on the Capitals, for example? Bowey, Chorney, Kempny. You're saying Chris Wideman would be fighting for ice time with those guys?
GM Hockey
Go to page : 1, 2, 3 ... 34 ... 67
wprager wrote:But we're not taking about to four. Your said half our D are 7D.
If they still insist on playing Ceci as a shutdown guy it doesn't matter who plays with him; it will be disasterous.
Be careful what you wish for. For example, to offset higher taxes in Ontario, Quebec and California, clubs in those markets have 14% more cap room to equal cap room for teams from Florida, Texas, Washington, Tennessee, etc....DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Flo The Action wrote:Interesting to see the Dvorak and Larkin deals. 6 and 5 years. Nice to see teams not going for the max lengths.
I wouldn't be surprised if contract length is a contentious issue in the next CBA.
I hope taxation issues are somehow discussed. Unfair that Canadian teams have to deal with both higher taxes and exchange rates. Wish there was an offset.
Flo The Action wrote:wprager wrote:But we're not taking about to four. Your said half our D are 7D.
If they still insist on playing Ceci as a shutdown guy it doesn't matter who plays with him; it will be disasterous.
Yeah I did. After karlsson, Ceci and chabot it’s pretty much 7th D. I think Wideman is a 6th, 7D on a good team. My opinion. I don’t think he’s shown enough to get enough minutes or to be paired on nothing more than the bottom pairing. If anything I think he’d be better utilized on the PP but not as much outside of it.
I totally agree though that Ceci is miscast as a shutdown D. I have no idea why that decision has been made or what they are trying to teach him but they are completely limiting his potential. They better not do that to chabot.
If kalrsson gets dealt I hope they get in return an all around good Dman good in all zones. Someone that could grow with chabot for the top pairing. Sergachev and chabot pairing might be crazy, too young to handle that responsibility but deadly down the line. Or I like the idea of Theodore out of Vegas that could play with Ceci. But that leaves a hole on the right side.
Smarty pantsspader wrote:Flo The Action wrote:wprager wrote:But we're not taking about to four. Your said half our D are 7D.
If they still insist on playing Ceci as a shutdown guy it doesn't matter who plays with him; it will be disasterous.
Yeah I did. After karlsson, Ceci and chabot it’s pretty much 7th D. I think Wideman is a 6th, 7D on a good team. My opinion. I don’t think he’s shown enough to get enough minutes or to be paired on nothing more than the bottom pairing. If anything I think he’d be better utilized on the PP but not as much outside of it.
I totally agree though that Ceci is miscast as a shutdown D. I have no idea why that decision has been made or what they are trying to teach him but they are completely limiting his potential. They better not do that to chabot.
If kalrsson gets dealt I hope they get in return an all around good Dman good in all zones. Someone that could grow with chabot for the top pairing. Sergachev and chabot pairing might be crazy, too young to handle that responsibility but deadly down the line. Or I like the idea of Theodore out of Vegas that could play with Ceci. But that leaves a hole on the right side.
Yup. I agree with the bolded.
Flo The Action wrote:Smarty pantsspader wrote:Flo The Action wrote:wprager wrote:But we're not taking about to four. Your said half our D are 7D.
If they still insist on playing Ceci as a shutdown guy it doesn't matter who plays with him; it will be disasterous.
Yeah I did. After karlsson, Ceci and chabot it’s pretty much 7th D. I think Wideman is a 6th, 7D on a good team. My opinion. I don’t think he’s shown enough to get enough minutes or to be paired on nothing more than the bottom pairing. If anything I think he’d be better utilized on the PP but not as much outside of it.
I totally agree though that Ceci is miscast as a shutdown D. I have no idea why that decision has been made or what they are trying to teach him but they are completely limiting his potential. They better not do that to chabot.
If kalrsson gets dealt I hope they get in return an all around good Dman good in all zones. Someone that could grow with chabot for the top pairing. Sergachev and chabot pairing might be crazy, too young to handle that responsibility but deadly down the line. Or I like the idea of Theodore out of Vegas that could play with Ceci. But that leaves a hole on the right side.
Yup. I agree with the bolded.
wprager wrote:I think the Sens D lacks a bit of experience and could use a top-4 leftie. Oduya wasn't much of a loss, Phaneuf kinda was. Claesson was very odd. I didn't think he was as bad as not even getting a QO. It's not like he was making a lot of money, either.
wprager wrote:Maybe Ceci should play the left side.
Ceci-Karlsson
Chabot-Wideman
Wolanin-Jaros
I'm scared of any second pairing with Ceci. Playing with Karlsson means he'll spend most of his time on the offensive zone.
Chabot-Wideman are both good passers and Chabot is a great skater. They should be able to move the puck out.
Wolanin-Jaros would then be the PK pairing. Yikes.
tim1_2 wrote:WTF is Harpur - Karlsson? No thanks. Based on watching Harpur last year, he shouldn't be in the NHL.
DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:tim1_2 wrote:WTF is Harpur - Karlsson? No thanks. Based on watching Harpur last year, he shouldn't be in the NHL.
You hope he figures out how to use his size. I am not saying it's a good combination. I am saying it's what is likely to happen.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3 ... 34 ... 67
GM Hockey » The other NHL teams » General Hockey talk » General Hockey Talk - Injuries, signings, factoids + other news from around the league
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|