And before you go off an say that Smith does not belong on that list imagine if he was not signed -- would anyone offer him much after the season he had? Or even the last 2?
GM Hockey
Go to page : 1, 2, 3 ... 34 ... 67
wprager wrote:PTO, why? They've got plenty of PTO-like players as it is. Gaborik, Pajaarvi, Pyatt, Boedker, Smith. Can you think of any old free agents that would be any better than someone on that list?
I don’t know. Isn’t there warts to his game? Like serious warts?wprager wrote:What is Sbisa up to?
Flo The Action wrote:I don’t know. Isn’t there warts to his game? Like serious warts?wprager wrote:What is Sbisa up to?
Well maybe the sens should have a look at that. It’s not like our D is a powerhouse.wprager wrote:Flo The Action wrote:I don’t know. Isn’t there warts to his game? Like serious warts?wprager wrote:What is Sbisa up to?
They mentioned how he played every gamee of the WCF and the Cup Finals.
wprager wrote:That sounds like a bit of a hyperbole. Karlsson, Ceci, Wideman, Jaros. That's pretty decent on the right side. The left side has Chabot, Wolanin, Boro.
After that you've got the Harpurs, Englunds, Sieloffs and so on.
If you bring in Sbisa to play on the second pairing, that gives you Boro/Wolanin as the 6/7. I can live with that. Actually, it's too early to play Chabot in the top pairing, so Sbisa with Karlsson.
Karlsson- Sbisa
Ceci - Chabot
Wideman - Wolanin
Jaros/Boro/Harpur as the extras.
No matter how you slice it, the second pairing is scary.
wprager wrote:But we're not taking about to four. Your said half our D are 7D.
If they still insist on playing Ceci as a shutdown guy it doesn't matter who plays with him; it will be disasterous.
Be careful what you wish for. For example, to offset higher taxes in Ontario, Quebec and California, clubs in those markets have 14% more cap room to equal cap room for teams from Florida, Texas, Washington, Tennessee, etc....DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:tim1_2 wrote:Flo The Action wrote:Interesting to see the Dvorak and Larkin deals. 6 and 5 years. Nice to see teams not going for the max lengths.
I wouldn't be surprised if contract length is a contentious issue in the next CBA.
I hope taxation issues are somehow discussed. Unfair that Canadian teams have to deal with both higher taxes and exchange rates. Wish there was an offset.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3 ... 34 ... 67
GM Hockey » The other NHL teams » General Hockey talk » General Hockey Talk - Injuries, signings, factoids + other news from around the league
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|