Prager's Brackets - 2011!

wprager wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:Spreadsheet uploaded:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/955066/2011_PlayOffs_Pool.xls

I've added a column "autopick" -- those are the picks for home team winning in 7 games in each series. It's tied for 3rd.

Hilarious. A "do nothing" approach finds itself in 3rd.

VAN in 4 gets me THE WIN!!!!!

I see I could have safely chosen VAN in 5 too. Oh well.

I didn't even bother running the scenarios, I knew I had to pick Boston. Question was, how many games. Boston in 7, baby!

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:Spreadsheet uploaded:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/955066/2011_PlayOffs_Pool.xls

I've added a column "autopick" -- those are the picks for home team winning in 7 games in each series. It's tied for 3rd.

Hilarious. A "do nothing" approach finds itself in 3rd.

VAN in 4 gets me THE WIN!!!!!

I see I could have safely chosen VAN in 5 too. Oh well.

I didn't even bother running the scenarios, I knew I had to pick Boston. Question was, how many games. Boston in 7, baby!

The only scenario that gets me a win is if I'm the only one that correctly guesses the winner and # of games. We shall see...

spader wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:Spreadsheet uploaded:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/955066/2011_PlayOffs_Pool.xls

I've added a column "autopick" -- those are the picks for home team winning in 7 games in each series. It's tied for 3rd.

Hilarious. A "do nothing" approach finds itself in 3rd.

VAN in 4 gets me THE WIN!!!!!

I see I could have safely chosen VAN in 5 too. Oh well.

I didn't even bother running the scenarios, I knew I had to pick Boston. Question was, how many games. Boston in 7, baby!

The only scenario that gets me a win is if I'm the only one that correctly guesses the winner and # of games. We shall see...

I got excited thinking I could sneak ahead of you, but Hobiesens has one more point than I do and also picked Van in 5. So I could, but Hobiesens will, without question, stay ahead of me. Hobiesens!

shabbs wrote:I'm smelling a sweep...

wprager wrote:

shabbs wrote:I'm smelling a sweep...

I think Burrows will come down with a case of food poisoning.

shabbs wrote:

spader wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:Spreadsheet uploaded:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/955066/2011_PlayOffs_Pool.xls

I've added a column "autopick" -- those are the picks for home team winning in 7 games in each series. It's tied for 3rd.

Hilarious. A "do nothing" approach finds itself in 3rd.

VAN in 4 gets me THE WIN!!!!!

I see I could have safely chosen VAN in 5 too. Oh well.

I didn't even bother running the scenarios, I knew I had to pick Boston. Question was, how many games. Boston in 7, baby!

The only scenario that gets me a win is if I'm the only one that correctly guesses the winner and # of games. We shall see...

I got excited thinking I could sneak ahead of you, but Hobiesens has one more point than I do and also picked Van in 5. So I could, but Hobiesens will, without question, stay ahead of me. Hobiesens!

Flo also beats you by a point in that scenario... you end up in 3rd.

spader wrote:

shabbs wrote:

spader wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:Spreadsheet uploaded:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/955066/2011_PlayOffs_Pool.xls

I've added a column "autopick" -- those are the picks for home team winning in 7 games in each series. It's tied for 3rd.

Hilarious. A "do nothing" approach finds itself in 3rd.

VAN in 4 gets me THE WIN!!!!!

I see I could have safely chosen VAN in 5 too. Oh well.

I didn't even bother running the scenarios, I knew I had to pick Boston. Question was, how many games. Boston in 7, baby!

The only scenario that gets me a win is if I'm the only one that correctly guesses the winner and # of games. We shall see...

I got excited thinking I could sneak ahead of you, but Hobiesens has one more point than I do and also picked Van in 5. So I could, but Hobiesens will, without question, stay ahead of me. Hobiesens!

Flo also beats you by a point in that scenario... you end up in 3rd.

I mean no offence to anyone, but I'm only counting people who made their own picks.

wprager wrote:Who's to say that Flo figured he'd be picking the home team in 7 anyway? Why not just save the time?

spader wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:

shabbs wrote:

wprager wrote:Spreadsheet uploaded:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/955066/2011_PlayOffs_Pool.xls

I've added a column "autopick" -- those are the picks for home team winning in 7 games in each series. It's tied for 3rd.

Hilarious. A "do nothing" approach finds itself in 3rd.

VAN in 4 gets me THE WIN!!!!!

I see I could have safely chosen VAN in 5 too. Oh well.

I didn't even bother running the scenarios, I knew I had to pick Boston. Question was, how many games. Boston in 7, baby!

The only scenario that gets me a win is if I'm the only one that correctly guesses the winner and # of games. We shall see...

I got excited thinking I could sneak ahead of you, but Hobiesens has one more point than I do and also picked Van in 5. So I could, but Hobiesens will, without question, stay ahead of me. Hobiesens!

tim1_2 wrote:I took Boston in 5 just to have whatever little shot I could at moving up the ladder. And my dream is STILL ALIVE (until 11pm tonight).

shabbs wrote:

tim1_2 wrote:I took Boston in 5 just to have whatever little shot I could at moving up the ladder. And my dream is STILL ALIVE (until 11pm tonight).

You've got until 11pm tomorrow night.... game is on Sat.

tim1_2 wrote:

shabbs wrote:

tim1_2 wrote:I took Boston in 5 just to have whatever little shot I could at moving up the ladder. And my dream is STILL ALIVE (until 11pm tonight).

You've got until 11pm tomorrow night.... game is on Sat.

Oh yeah, that's right. THE DREAM LIVES ON!!!!!!

Dare to Dream...etc etc....