Sens on July 1st, Free Agents, Trades - Interesting storylines to watch.

Gohan wrote:

wprager wrote:The "thanks for the warm welcome" so-called giveaway was used once, two days ago. The feud started with Roche's third post here, when he said he disagreed with Neely. How dare he, a rookie with 2 posts under his belt! It was the same thing with Clover and a couple of others. The constant here is Neely, not some random members.

In his defense, Clover and a couple of others were all idiots who thought they knew more than everyone else. Any one of us here knows N4L isn't the type to let bad opinions presented as the right opinion go unnoticed... his confrontational tone is also a fraction of what it used to be.

Bad opinions and good opinions? Opinions are just what they are; opinions. They can be based on facts or fantasy but they're just opinions; they don't have to be logical; you can agree with an opinion or disagree but I don't know if you can call it good or bad.

Big Ev wrote:What do you mean admin powers? I think it's the power of google.

Yep, definitely google.

In one of your (CockRoche's) earlier posts you mentioned the year you were drafted and the team that drafted you. You may want to re-visit that post and edit out some of that information. To do that, just click on Profile, then See my profile, then under "Find all posts by ..." click on Posts. The posts are ordered by time, in descending order, so you'll have to go to the last page for the earliest ones.

TheAvatar wrote:

Gohan wrote:

wprager wrote:The "thanks for the warm welcome" so-called giveaway was used once, two days ago. The feud started with Roche's third post here, when he said he disagreed with Neely. How dare he, a rookie with 2 posts under his belt! It was the same thing with Clover and a couple of others. The constant here is Neely, not some random members.

In his defense, Clover and a couple of others were all idiots who thought they knew more than everyone else. Any one of us here knows N4L isn't the type to let bad opinions presented as the right opinion go unnoticed... his confrontational tone is also a fraction of what it used to be.

Bad opinions and good opinions? Opinions are just what they are; opinions. They can be based on facts or fantasy but they're just opinions; they don't have to be logical; you can agree with an opinion or disagree but I don't know if you can call it good or bad.

Fair enough...by "bad opinions" I meant illogical statements and nonsensical inference. I was being lazy.

"Lazy posters" are the bane of online fora.