Combined standing since the Lockout

http://corywilkins.wordpress.com/blog/

Combined Standings since Lockout

The following is a look at the NHL standings from the beginning of the first post-lockout year (2005-06), combined over the past four-and-a-half seasons, running to the 41st game this season for each team. Over that span, each team has played a combined 369 games. Each team’s wins, losses, overtime points, total points and winning percentage are shown.

Rk. Team .. W .... L .... OTL .. PTS .....W%
01. DET ... 234 ... 91 .. 44 ... 512 ....694
02. SJ .... 223 .. 102 .. 44 ... 490 ....664
03. NJ .... 222 .. 117 .. 30 ... 474 ....642
04. BUF ... 211 .. 120 .. 38 ... 460 ....623
05. NSH ... 205 .. 128 .. 36 ... 446 ....604
06. DAL ... 202 .. 125 .. 42 ... 446 ....604
07. CGY ... 201 .. 126 .. 42 ... 444 ....602
08. OTT ... 200 .. 128 .. 42 ... 442 ....599
09. ANA ... 196 .. 125 .. 48 ... 440 ....596
10. VAN ... 199 .. 134 .. 36 ... 434 ....588
11. NYR ... 190 .. 130 .. 49 ... 429 ....581
12. MTL ... 191 .. 139 .. 39 ... 421 ....570
13. CAR ... 191 .. 142 .. 36 ... 418 ....566
14. MIN ... 190 .. 141 .. 38 ... 418 ....566
15. PIT ... 187 .. 139 .. 43 ... 417 ....565
16. BOS ... 179 .. 139 .. 51 ... 409 ....554
17. COL ... 186 .. 149 .. 34 ... 406 ....550
18. WSH ... 174 .. 147 .. 48 ... 396 ....537
19. PHI ... 172 .. 149 .. 48 ... 392 ....531
20. FLA ... 167 .. 148 .. 54 ... 388 ....526
21. CHI ... 171 .. 153 .. 45 ... 387 ....524
22. TOR ... 165 .. 152 .. 52 ... 382 ....518
23. ATL ... 171 .. 159 .. 39 ... 381 ....516
24. EDM ... 168 .. 162 .. 39 ... 375 ....508
25. TB .... 158 .. 163 .. 48 ... 364 ....493
26. PHX ... 167 .. 174 .. 28 ... 362 ....491
27. CMB ... 158 .. 170 .. 41 ... 357 ....484
28. LA .... 158 .. 171 .. 40 ... 356 ....482
29. NYI ... 153 .. 173 .. 43 ... 349 ....473
30. STL ... 146 .. 166 .. 57 ... 349 ....473

8th place isnt too shabby... Hopefully we can make some ground and be in the top 5 eventually... Nashvile kinda surprised me even if they made the playoffs every year exept last...

If you look at it by Conference then we'd be 3rd overall. If you factored in Division leaders we'd be 4th.

I'd say that's pretty darn good.

Cap'n Clutch wrote:If you look at it by Conference then we'd be 3rd overall. If you factored in Division leaders we'd be 4th.

I'd say that's pretty darn good.

And if you take out the last two years then ...

Sorry, SpezD, but what's this all about? How is it relevant?

wprager wrote:

Cap'n Clutch wrote:If you look at it by Conference then we'd be 3rd overall. If you factored in Division leaders we'd be 4th.

I'd say that's pretty darn good.

And if you take out the last two years then ...

Sorry, SpezD, but what's this all about? How is it relevant?

Perhaps a little positive spin?

Why is Pitts all the way at 15th? Crazy. They have a Cup to show in that time span too. Depressing.

wprager wrote:

Cap'n Clutch wrote:If you look at it by Conference then we'd be 3rd overall. If you factored in Division leaders we'd be 4th.

I'd say that's pretty darn good.

And if you take out the last two years then ...

Sorry, SpezD, but what's this all about? How is it relevant?

Just some interesting stuff.... It's not relevant to anything.

caissie_1 wrote:8th place isnt too shabby... Hopefully we can make some ground and be in the top 5 eventually... Nashvile kinda surprised me even if they made the playoffs every year exept last...

Good catch. That's what most people's first reaction is as well.

wprager wrote:And if you take out the last two years then ...

Sorry, SpezD, but what's this all about? How is it relevant?

Just for fun.