Would you? Batherson for Zegras
GM Hockey
DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:Would you? Batherson for Zegras
Especially now that he's injured.Ev wrote:DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:Would you? Batherson for Zegras
Nah.
wprager wrote:Nobody's talking about the big news that Bierk has been moved to scouting and Belleville goalie coach, Justin Peters, has been promoted to the big club.
Ev wrote:wprager wrote:Nobody's talking about the big news that Bierk has been moved to scouting and Belleville goalie coach, Justin Peters, has been promoted to the big club.
Definitely needed some change there. I don’t even care though at the moment, I’m not even watching anymore
wprager wrote:How many veterans do you need? We've got Giroux and Tarasenko up front and Hamonic on D. Chychrun has played 424 games and Chabot and Brady are both nearing 400. Maybe a better question would be what you consider a veteran.
Ev wrote:wprager wrote:How many veterans do you need? We've got Giroux and Tarasenko up front and Hamonic on D. Chychrun has played 424 games and Chabot and Brady are both nearing 400. Maybe a better question would be what you consider a veteran.
Well tarasenko is for sure gone. We need a veteran top 9 and top 6 D who will be here for at least 3 years imo. Weegar would be good although I don’t like his contract term. Guentzel would be a good guy to overpay too
Ev wrote:wprager wrote:How many veterans do you need? We've got Giroux and Tarasenko up front and Hamonic on D. Chychrun has played 424 games and Chabot and Brady are both nearing 400. Maybe a better question would be what you consider a veteran.
Well tarasenko is for sure gone. We need a veteran top 9 and top 6 D who will be here for at least 3 years imo. Weegar would be good although I don’t like his contract term. Guentzel would be a good guy to overpay too
wprager wrote:Ev wrote:wprager wrote:How many veterans do you need? We've got Giroux and Tarasenko up front and Hamonic on D. Chychrun has played 424 games and Chabot and Brady are both nearing 400. Maybe a better question would be what you consider a veteran.
Well tarasenko is for sure gone. We need a veteran top 9 and top 6 D who will be here for at least 3 years imo. Weegar would be good although I don’t like his contract term. Guentzel would be a good guy to overpay too
So 399 games (Chabot) doesn't cut it as a veteran but 432 (Weegar) does? Or are you saying we need a vet in addition to Chabot (especially since it looks like Chychrun is as good as gone and Hamonic was finally shown the bench).
Ev wrote:Nah we don’t need those guys. The season is over. Look to get some trades or FA done in the summer
DefenceWinsChampionships wrote:Ev wrote:Nah we don’t need those guys. The season is over. Look to get some trades or FA done in the summer
Disagree. It's never too late to bring minimum contracts to teach people to play during the game. I'd rather make these investments with 40 games left then have a slow vet on the team next year tbh.
Tkachuk-Greig-Giroux
Norris-Stutzle-Batherson
Joseph-Pinto-XXXX
XXXX-XXXX-XXXX
Chabot-XXXX
Sanderson-Zub
XXXX-XXXX
XXXX
Korpisalo
This should be our lineup heading into next season. Everything else is up for grabs IMO. I'd like to sign Halliday out of college and see how he does at the end of the year. Give Kleven, Jarventie, Ostapchuk, Boucher some NHL minutes but no guarantees heading into next year.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum